Environmental Evaluation of Different Heating Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study compares environmental impact of different heating systems with life cycle analysis, and get out if heat pump system has advantage in replacing boiler heating systems. Systems energy use are compared in one-year operation phase for residential buildings located in Tianjin city, including waste water heat pump system, coal boiler system and gas boiler system. In order to analyzed the environment performance of heat pump system in different conditions. The power structure impact to heat pump systems is analyzed using life cycle analysis method. The results indicate that with COP=4, even if 100% coal power is used, heat pump has advantage in the most impact factors, and if more clean power is used, the environment impact in heat pump system will be reduced obviously. The result also shows that waste water use in heat pump system impact the result little for its small quantity. Nomenclature GW, Global Warming; NRC: Non-renewable Resource Consumption; OD: Ozone Depletion; ACI, Acidification; EUT, Eutrophication; SPO, Synthesis of photochemical ozone; SW, Solid Waste; HW, Hazardous Waste; SD, Smoke and Dust. RC: Renewable Resource Consumption

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

2156-2160

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cockroft J, Kelly N: Energy Convers Manage . Vol47. (2006), pp.15-16.

Google Scholar

[2] Ossebaard ME, van Wijk AJM, van Wees MT: Energy. Vol22. (1997), pp.1087-98.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Fu, B. Lin, X. Zhang: Journal of Tongji University. Vol34. (2006), pp.1383-1388.

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Zhu, L. Shi, J. Chen, G. Li: Journal of North China Electric Power University. Vol31. (2004), pp.93-96.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Brenn, P. Soltic., Ch. Bach: Energy and Buildings. Vol42. (2010), pp.904-908.

Google Scholar

[6] Chen Chengmin, Zhang Yufeng, Ma Lijun: Energy and Buildings. Vol48. (2011), p.168–174.

Google Scholar

[7] Katarína Heikkilä: Building and Environment. Vol 39 (2004), p.1133 – 1140.

Google Scholar

[8] China Electric Power Planning Writing Group: China Electric Power Planning(China Water Power Press,Beijing, 1994).

Google Scholar