Characteristics Research of Aqueduct under FSI Dynamic Response

Article Preview

Abstract:

Maximum distribution of hydrodynamic pressure on the flume sidewall were studied in this paper based on the finite element method. It contains the difference comparison of theoretical and numerical formulas, rules of maximum hydrodynamic pressure distribution under regular and irregular incentives, and hydrodynamic pressure changes with different height of bracket below the aqueduct. Studies show that: In the 30m height range, with the rise of bracket, the hydrodynamic pressure grows linearly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

2367-2370

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Housner G W. The dynamic behavior of water tanks[J]. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America. Vol. 53(2). pp: 381-389. (1963).

DOI: 10.1785/bssa0530020381

Google Scholar

[2] Jin, Qian; Li, Xin; Sun, Ning. Experimental and numerical study on tuned liquid dampers for controlling earthquake response of jacket offshore platform[J]. Vol. 20(4). pp: 238-254. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.05.002

Google Scholar

[3] Israeli M, Orszag S A. Approximation of radiation boundary conditions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics. 1981, 41(1): 115-135.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90082-6

Google Scholar

[4] Larsen J, Dancy H. Open boundaries in short wave simulations — A new approach[J]. Coastal Engineering. 1983, 7(3): 285-297.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3839(83)90022-4

Google Scholar

[5] Brorsen M, Larsen J. Source generation of nonlinear gravity waves with the boundary integral equation method[J]. Coastal Engineering. 1987, 11(2): 93-113.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3839(87)90001-9

Google Scholar

[6] Wei G, Kirby J T, Sinha A. Generation of waves in Boussinesq models using a source function method[J]. Coastal Engineering. 1999, 36(4): 271-299.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3839(99)00009-5

Google Scholar