The Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions at the Different Ages of Tea in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Wen Hao Xie; Guo Mei Jia; Fang Qing Chen

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.2645

Paper Titles

Effects of Sandbag Sand Barrier on Soil Hardness
p.2623

Preliminary Study on the Detection and Analysis of Soil Properties
p.2632

Microbial Dynamic Changes under Different Grazing Intensities in Growing Seasons of Desert Steppe
p.2635

Analysis of Ecological Landscape Pattern Change in the Poyang Lake Eco-Economic Zone of China
p.2639

The Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions at the Different Ages of Tea in Three Gorges Reservoir Area
p.2645

The Soil Magnetic Susceptibility and its Environmental Significance of Garden and Cultivated Land in Xuchang City
p.2649

Experimental Study on the Landscape Combined Sewage Treatment Technology
p.2654

Spatial Econometric Analysis of Cultivated Land Change and its Influencing Factors in the Poyang Lake Eco-Economics Zone
p.2659

China Southern Rural Ecological Landscape Planning and Design Practice Research - Take Stone Vicious Village in Guishan Macheng Hubei as an Example
p.2665

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 864-867The Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions at the...

The Soil Labile Organic Carbon Fractions at the Different Ages of Tea in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Abstract:

Soil total organic carbon (TOC), readily oxidizable C (ROC), and microbial biomass C (MBC) were determined at the different ages of tea in Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. The results showed that soil TOC and ROC in the 0-20cm decreased gradually with age of tea garden, whereas MBC had no significant difference among sites. OC, ROC, and MBC decreased readily with depth. Soil total organic C only showed a significantly positive relationship with readily oxidizable C. The age of tea showed a significantly negative relationship with TOC and ROC.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

2645-2648

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.2645

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2013

Authors:

Wen Hao Xie, Guo Mei Jia*, Fang Qing Chen

Keywords:

MBC, ROC, Soil Total Organic C, TEA

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Y.Z. Su, F. Wang, D.R. Suo, Z.H. Zhang, M.W. Du: Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. Vol. 75(2006), pp.285-295.

Google Scholar

[2] F.J. Stevenson: Humus chemistry: genesis composition reactions. Wiley, New York. (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] E.G. Gregorich, M.R. Carter, D.A. Angers, C.M. Monreal, B.H. Ellert: Can. J Soil Sci. Vol. 74(1994), pp.367-385.

DOI: 10.4141/cjss94-051

Google Scholar

[4] S. Hu, D.C. Coleman, C.R. Carroll, P.F. Hendrix, M.H. Beare: Agric. Ecosys. Environ. Vol. 65(1997), pp.69-78.

Google Scholar

[5] FAO: FAOSTAT data, (2007) Http: / www. fao. org.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Li, X. Wu, H. Xue, B. Gu, H. Chen, J. Zeng, C. Peng: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. Vol. 141(2011), pp.390-398.

Google Scholar

[7] K.Y. Chan, A. Bowman, A. Oates: Soil Sci. Vol. 166 (2001), pp.61-67.

Google Scholar

[8] P. C. Brookes, A. Landman, G. Pruden, and D. S. Jenkinson: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 17(1985), p.837–842.

Google Scholar

[9] E. D. Vance, P. C. Brookes, and D. S. Jenkinson: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 19(1987), p.703–707.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Han, S.J. Kemmitt, P.C. Brookes: Soil Biology and Biochemistry Vol. 39(2007), pp.1468-1478.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Pansombat, S. Kanazawa, T. Horiguchi: Soil Science and Plant Nutrient Vol. 43(1997), pp.317-327.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Belay, A.S. Claasens, F.C. Wehner: Biology and Fertility of soils Vol. 35(2002), pp.420-427.

Google Scholar

[13] M.B. McGill, K.R. Gannon, J.A. Robertson, F.D. Cook: Canadian Journal of Soil Science Vol. 66(1986), pp.1-19.

Google Scholar

[14] J.A. Entry, c. c. Mitchell, C.B. Backman: Biology and Fertility of Soils Vol. 23(1996), pp.353-358.

Google Scholar