Reasonability Evaluation of Land Reclamation Using the Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Four Farms in Guangxi, South China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Taking Guangxi agriculture and cultivation state-owned Jinguang Farm, Qianjiang Farm, Xinxing Farm and Liangqi Farm as land reclamation cases studies, 16 evaluation indices were selected from four aspects, i.e., investment in land reclamation project, implementation intensity of land reclamation, land use structure, and efficiency output of land reclamation, to evaluate the reasonability of land reclamation in the project area. The improved TOPSIS method and obstacle degree model were used to evaluate reasonability and diagnose obstacle factors. Results showed that the efficiency output of land reclamation had the greatest impact on its reasonability, followed by land use structure, with investment of land reclamation project having the least impact. The index obstacle factors mainly referred to the improved value of land quality. Through analysis of the evaluation results, the reasonability and obstacle factors of land reclamation were objectively determined to provide a reference for land reclamation in practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

2672-2682

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.B. Yang: The Post Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projeet in Rural (Ph.D., Southwestern University, China 2011), p.47.

Google Scholar

[2] F.F. Jia: Study on the Evaluation of Land Consolidation Benefit (Ph.D., Beijing Forestry University, China 2007), p.8.

Google Scholar

[3] H.L. Long: Progress in Geography Vol. 22(2003), p.133.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Luo and H.L. Long: Geography and Geo-Information Science Vol. 19(2003), p.60.

Google Scholar

[5] X.J. Gao and Z.S. Ju: Resources & Industries Vol. 7(2005), p.1.

Google Scholar

[6] K.N. Li: The Research on the Priority Evaluation of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Projects Based on Principal Component Analysis (Ph.D., Gansu Agricultural University, Gansu 2012. ) , p.23.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.H. Hu: Mathematics In Practice and Theory Vol. 32(2002), p.572.

Google Scholar

[8] C.Y. Lu, F. Wen and Q.Y. Yang: Resources Science Vol. 33(2011), p.536.

Google Scholar

[9] G.S. Qiu, S.M. Zou and R.H. Liu: Journal of Nanchang Institute of Aeronautical Technology Vol. 19(2005), p.1.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Wen and X.L. Liu: Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas Vol. 27(2009), p.235.

Google Scholar

[11] H.N. Vanlier: Zeitschrift fur Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung Vol. 41(2000), p.138.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.T. Li and Y. Zhang: Environmental Science and Management Vol. 34(2009), p.109.

Google Scholar

[13] X.J. Li, Y.D. Fang and S.F. Tian: Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering Vol. 23(2007), p.71.

Google Scholar

[14] J.Z. Gong, Y.S. Liu and W.L. Chen: Land Use Policy Vol. 29(2012), p.464.

Google Scholar

[15] R.B. Thapa and Y. Murayama: Land Use Policy Vol. 25(2008. ), p.225.

Google Scholar

[16] P. Sklenicka: Land Use Policy Vol. 23(2006), p.502.

Google Scholar

[17] X.H. Lu, X.K. Gu and R.P. Li: Land Consilidation (Fudan University Press, Shanghai, China 2011).

Google Scholar

[18] R.H. Platt: Land Use and Society: Geography, law, and public policy (Island Press, Washington 1996).

Google Scholar