The Moderating Effect of Enviropreneurship on Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainability Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Enviropreneurship is an entrepreneurial orientation that addresses environmental problems and accommodates societal needs while simultaneously meeting the economic objective of organizations. As such, enviropreneurship can serve as a critical moderating factor that influences the relationship between green supply chain management practices (GSCMP) and sustainability performance in the Malaysian manufacturing sector. A research framework of the identified GSCMP, enviropreneurship and sustainability performance is developed with a view towards suggesting how such research might systematically be carried out. Accordingly, such thought depends upon more detailed empirical research by using advanced structural equation modeling approaches. The research findings will be particularly important for manufacturers in nurturing an entrepreneurial orientation within their organization in order to achieve sustainability performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 869-870)

Pages:

773-776

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. T. Mentzer, Supply Chain Management, United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc., (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (5th ed. ) The United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc., (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] K. Chandra and S. Kumar, Supply Chain Management in Theory and Practice: A Passing Fad or a Fundamental Change? Industrial Management & Data System, 100(3), pp.100-113, (2000).

DOI: 10.1108/02635570010286168

Google Scholar

[4] S. Li, S. Subba Rao, T. S. Ragu-Nathan and B. Ragu-Nathan, Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Studying Supply Chain Management Practices, Journal of Operations Management, 23, pp.618-641, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.01.002

Google Scholar

[5] C. Ninlawan, P. Seksan, K. Tossapol and W. Pilada, The Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Electronics Industry. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 3, March 17-19, Hong Kong, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] A. A. Hervani, M. M Helms and J. Sarkis, Performance Measurement for Green Supply Chain Management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), pp.330-353, (2005).

DOI: 10.1108/14635770510609015

Google Scholar

[7] C. R. Carter and D. S. Rogers, A Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(5), pp.360-387, (2008).

DOI: 10.1108/09600030810882816

Google Scholar

[8] M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 84(12), pp.78-92, (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] A. Menon and A. Menon, Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy, Journal of Marketing, 61(1), pp.51-67, (1997).

DOI: 10.1177/002224299706100105

Google Scholar

[10] C. Lee, K. Lee and J. M. Pennings, Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study on Technology-Based Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), pp.615-640, (2001).

DOI: 10.1002/smj.181

Google Scholar

[11] S. D. Hunt and R. M. Morgan, Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions, Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.107-114, (1996).

DOI: 10.1177/002224299606000410

Google Scholar

[12] E. Mosakowski, Entrepreneurial Resource, Organizational Choice, and Competitive Outcomes, Organizational Science, 9(6), pp.625-643, (1998).

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.9.6.625

Google Scholar

[13] R. G. Schroeder, K. A. Bates and M. A. Junttila, A Resource-Based View of Manufacturing Strategy and the Relationship to Manufacturing Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), pp.105-117, (2002).

DOI: 10.1002/smj.213

Google Scholar

[14] A. Paulraj, Understanding the Relationships between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management and Organizational Sustainability, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), pp.19-37, (2011).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03212.x

Google Scholar

[15] D. Holt and A. Ghobadian, An Empirical Study of Green Supply Chain Management Practices Amongst UK manufacturers, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), pp.933-956, (2009).

DOI: 10.1108/17410380910984212

Google Scholar

[16] K. W. Green Jr, P. J. Zelbst, J. Meacham and V. S. Bhadauria, Green Supply Chain Management Practices: Impact on Performance, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), pp.290-305, (2012).

DOI: 10.1108/13598541211227126

Google Scholar

[17] R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. (2nd ed. ) New York: Guilford Press, (2005).

Google Scholar

[18] D. W. Gerbing and J. C. Anderson. An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, pp.186-192, (1988).

DOI: 10.1177/002224378802500207

Google Scholar