Research on Microchannel of PMMA Microfluidic Chip under Various Injection Molding Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microfluidic chip has bright application prospect in the field of chemical and biological analysis. PMMA is the best material for microfluidic chip fabrication because of its low cost, prominent electrochemical properties and biological compatibility. In this work, a triple-channel microfluidic chip was designed; a nickel mold insert with microstructure was fabricated by UV-LIGA technology, and then the injection mold was designed and fabricated. The change in cross-section dimensions of microchannel was chosen as evaluating indicator, and micro-injection molding experiments were carried out. Then the influence of process parameters on cross-section dimensions of microchannel was observed with microscope. Experiment results demonstrated that substrate and cover plate could be manufactured in a single injection molding process by "1+1" type mold, and the manufacturing cycle was reduced to less than 20s, so production efficiency was greatly enhanced. Best combination of process parameters was obtained when mold temperature was 80°C, melt temperature was 250°C and injection rate was 297mm/s. Thereby, high quality substrate and cover plate could be manufactured efficiently.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 87-88)

Pages:

381-386

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Song and K.Y. Lee, Macromol Res, 2006, 14, 121-128.

Google Scholar

[2] P. S. Dittrich, K. Tachikawa and A. Manz, Anal. Chem., 2006, 78, 3887-3908.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Yao, H. X. Wu, J. Wang, S. Qu and G. Chen, Chem. Eur. J., 2007, 13, 846-853.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Wang, G. Chen, M. P. Chatrathi and M. Musameh, Anal. Chem., 2004, 76, 298-302.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Chen, Y. H. Lin and J. Wang, Talanta, 2006, 68, 497-503.

Google Scholar

[6] V. Dolnik, S. R. Liu and S. Jovanovich, Electrophoresis, 2000, 21, 41-54.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Becker and C. Gartner, Electrophoresis, 2000, 21, 12-26.

Google Scholar

[8] B. Graß, A. Neyer, M. Johnck, D. Siepe, F. Eisenbeiß, G. Weber and R. Hergenroder, Sens. Actuators B, 2001, 72, 249-258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(00)00643-2

Google Scholar

[9] J. Rossier, F. Reymond and P. E. Michel, Electrophoresis, 2002, 23, 858-867.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Chen, L. Y. Zhang and G. Chen, Electrophoresis, 2008, 29, 1801-1814.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Becker and L. E. Locascio, Talanta, 2002, 56, 267-287.

Google Scholar

[12] G. B. Lee, S. H. Chen, G. R. Huang, W. C. Sung and Y. H. Lin, Sens. Actuators B, 2001, 75, 142-148.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Galloway, W. Stryjewski, A. Henry and S. M. Ford, Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 2407-2415.

Google Scholar

[14] E. Verpoorte, Electrophoresis, 2002, 23, 677-712.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Becker and C. Gartner, Anal Bioanal Chem, 2008, 390, 89-111.

Google Scholar

[16] Y.W. Loke, S.B. Tor, J.H. Chun, N. H. Loh, D. E. Hardt, Manuf Syst Technol, 2007, 1, 35-38.

Google Scholar

[17] D.A. Mair, E. Geiger, A.P. Pisano, M, J, Frechet and F Svec, Lab on a Chip, 2006, 6, 1346-1354.

Google Scholar