Influence of Vehicle Velocity and Wheelbase on Washboard Enhancement Coefficient

Article Preview

Abstract:

With finite element simulation method, the fatigue life of vehicle front floor is analyzed in different vehicle wheelbases and velocities, and the washboard enhancement coefficient is calculated, then K-v curve, K-m curve and K-v-m surface are drawn, with which influence of vehicle velocity and wheelbase on washboard enhancement coefficient is studied. The study results show that, when the wheelbase is constant, washboard enhancement coefficient increases first and then decreases with velocity increasing, and reaches peak at a certain velocity; when velocity is constant, washboard enhancement coefficient decreases as wheelbase increasing; when velocity and wheelbase both changes, washboard enhancement coefficient varies in K-v-m surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1116-1120

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wang Bing-gang. Car Reliability Project Technique[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, (1991).

Google Scholar

[2] Lev M. Klyatis. Principles Testing. SAE Technical Paper of Truck Accelerated Reliability 1999-01-1086.

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-1086

Google Scholar

[3] Li Peng. Research on Enhancement Test Coefficient for Automobile Proving Ground[D]. Jilin University, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Men Yuzhuo. Reliability Simulation and Test of Heavy-duty Truck Based on ADAMS[D]. Jilin University, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] VPG/Structure Tutorial. Fatigue Analysis using eta/VPG , April, (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] Bao Tiecheng, Cheng Wenping, Du Qing. Enhancement Coefficient of Motorcycle Reliability Test on Proving Ground[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2009. 42(7): 591-596.

Google Scholar

[7] Chen Jian Xiu Lei Ma Wenming. Research on Enhancement Coefficient of Automobile Electrical Connector Lab Reliability Test on Vibration[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 21(15): 1885-1889.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhou Chuan-yue, Zheng Hong-xia, Luo Hui-qiang, et al. Fatigue Analysis and Application and examples[M]. Beijing: Science Press, (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] Cheng Wenping. Theoretical Model of Enhancement Factor for Special Road of Motorcycle Testing Ground[J]. Small Internal Combustion Engine and Motorcycle, 2008,37(6):42-44.

Google Scholar

[10] Yu Haibo. Research on Reliability Test Method Correlated Proving Round with Customers Usage for Automotive Load Carrying System[D]. Jilin university, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] eta/VPGTM USER'S MANUAL. Mechanical System Simulation Package[M]. Version: 3. 0, Release Date: November 4, (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] Jiang De-zeng, Huang Xiao-qing, Tang Li-qun. Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Response of Three-Span Scaled-Down Guardrail System Under Impact Loading[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 31(3): 64-68.

Google Scholar

[13] Li Wen-liang, Zhou Wei, Guo Zhing-ping. Research on Simulation of Vehicle Reliability Road Test[C]. 2007 China International Conference of Automotive Safety Technology, 2007: 219-226.

Google Scholar

[14] Li Wen-liang, Zhou Wei, Guo Zhing-ping. Safety Dynamic Simulation Study on Car Impact against the High Curb[J]. Tractor & Farm Transporter2008,35(2): 27-29.

Google Scholar

[15] Zhou Wei, LI Wen-liang, Guo Zhi-ping. Study on Enhancement Coefficient of Washboard Road of Automobile Proving Ground[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2008, 25(11): 140-144.

DOI: 10.1061/jhtrcq.0000281

Google Scholar

[16] Proving Ground for Highway and Traffic the Ministry of Communications. Reliability Running Test Method for Automobiles Engineering Approval Evaluation[S], (2000).

Google Scholar

[17] Li Rong-li, Cheng Sheng-hui. Study on the Relation between Road Excitation or Vehicle Velocity and Road Intensifying Factor[J]. Vehicle & Power Technology, 1998, 69(1): 21-25.

Google Scholar