Cooperative Control for Satellite Formation Reconfiguration via Cyclic Pursuit Strategy

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigates a methodology for group coordination and cooperative control of satellites with the aim to achieve formation reconfiguration such as radius enlargement and phase angle adjustment. The proposed approach separates the control law into two distinct stages: planar movement control and orthogonal displacement suppression. The in plane approach is based on a cyclic pursuit strategy, where satellite i pursues satellite i +1. For phase angle adjustment, a control law that makes use of beacons guidance is synthesized to maintain the circling centre stationary. In the orthogonal direction, a linear feed back control on displacement and velocity is used. Simulation of two missions with low thrust are provided, which high light the over all effectiveness of the proposed approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1153-1159

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kang W, Sparks A, Siva B. Multi-satellite formation and reconfiguration. American Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 2000: 379-383.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang J. Research on autonomous formation reconfiguration techniques for distributed satellite systems, PhD Thesis, Graduate School of National University of Defense Technology, China, 2006.

Google Scholar

[3] Buettcher R, Cohen R. Autonomous agents in space missions, MSc Thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada, 2004.

Google Scholar

[4] Bernhart A. Polygons of pursuit. Scripta Mathematic, 1959, 24: 23-50.

Google Scholar

[5] Marshall J A, Broucke M E, Francis B A. Formations of vehicles in cyclic pursuit, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 2004, 49 (11): 1963-(1974).

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2004.837589

Google Scholar

[6] Marshall J A, Broucke M E, Francis B A. Pursuit formations of unicycles, Automatica, 2006, 42: 3-12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.001

Google Scholar

[7] Marshall J A. Pursuit formations of multi-vehicle system, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] Sinha A, Ghose D. Control of multiagent systems using linear cyclic pursuit with heterogenous controller gains,. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2007, 129: 135.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2764505

Google Scholar

[9] Sinha A, Ghose D. Generalization of nonlinear cyclic pursuit,. Automatica, 2007, 43: 954-(1960).

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.03.024

Google Scholar

[10] Sepulchre R, Paley D A, Leonard N E. Stabilization of planar collective motion: all-to-all communication, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2007, 52 (5): 811-824.

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2007.898077

Google Scholar

[11] Ceccarelli N, Di Marco M, Garulli A, Giannitrapani A. Collective circular motion of multi-vehicle systems, Automatica, 2008, 44 (12): 3025-3035.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.024

Google Scholar

[12] Kim T, Sugie T. Cooperative control for target-capturing task based on a cyclic pursuit strategy, Automatica, 2007, 43: 1426-1431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.01.018

Google Scholar

[13] Yang Tao. Research on pursuit theory and its application to space mission. Changsha : Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National University of Defense Technology, 2010: 18-38.

Google Scholar

[14] InterferometerArchitecture[EB/OL]. http: /planetquest. jpl. nasa. gov/TPF-I/architectureTradeStudies. cfm.

Google Scholar