Vacuum Inert Gas Atomisation of Cr-Mn-Ni Austenitic Steel Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Cr-Mn-Ni austenitic steel cast alloys containing 16 wt.-% chromium, 7 wt.-% manganese and 3 to 9 wt.-% nickel are used as matrix material to manufacture TRIP-Matrix-Composite containing MgO partially stabilised ZrO2 ceramics. In the present work, these steel master alloys were atomised via a vacuum inert gas atomisation to provide fine grain sized metal powders for the assembling of TRIP-Matrix-Composite. The atomised steel powders where characterised according to their chemical composition and the d50 mass median particle size determined by a laser diffraction analyses. The surface tension of the liquid steel alloys was experimentally investigated using the maximum bubble pressure (MBP) method. The reference austenitic steel alloy (AISI 304) has the highest surface tension and the highest mass median particle size compared to the Cr-Mn-Ni steel alloys, where d50 values are lower due to lower surface tension values. Finally, it is concluded from the present investigation, that the d50 size of the atomised steel powders decreases by a decrease of surface tension values for the liquid steel alloys.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1265-1269

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Weiß, H. Gutte and P.R. Scheller, Steel Research International 2006, 77, 727.

Google Scholar

[2] B.N. Putimtsev, Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics 1972, 11, 171.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Persson, A. Eliasson and P. Jönsson, Powder Metallurgy 2011, 45.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Baecker, W. Graf, W. Kawaters and J. Poetschke, Metall 1991, 45, 764.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Weigelt, C.G. Aneziris, A. Yanina and S. Guk, Steel Research International 2011, 82, 1080.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Dubberstein, M. Hötzel, R. Hagemann, P. Heller and P.R. Scheller, Steel Research International 2011, 82, 1122.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201100096

Google Scholar

[7] J. Lee, L. Thu Hoai and M. Shin, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2011, 42, 546.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Kishidaka, in Proc. Multidisciplinary Meeting on Sintered Metals and Magnetic Materials, Japan Society Of Powder And Powder Metallurgy, Japan 1972, 111.

Google Scholar

[9] P.N. Quested, R.F. Brooks, A.P. Day, M.J. Richardson and K.C. Mills, Powder Metallurgy 1997, 40, 131.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Krüger, S. Decker, R. Ohser-Wiedemann, D. Ehinger, S. Martin, U. Martin and H.J. Seifert, Steel Research International 2011, 82, 1017.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201100082

Google Scholar