Experiment and Numerical Simulation on Slugging Fluidization of Large Particles in Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed

Article Preview

Abstract:

The hydrodynamics of a two-dimensional gas-solid fluidized bed with 0.03 m diameter and 0.3 m height were studied experimentally and computationally. The slugging fluidization of large particles was experimentally investigated and simulated using the Fluent 6.3 computational fluid dynamics (CFD) package. By a series of cold-model test, characterization of gas-solid fluidization with large particles was studied. These results can be used to research slugging characteristics. A multifluid Eulerian model incorporating the kinetic theory for solid particles was applied to simulate the unsteady-state behavior and momentum exchange coefficients were calculated by using the Syamlal-OBrien drag functions. These results of the transfer of fluidization state, maximum bed expansion ratio and pressure fluctuation were systemically simulated in a gas-solid fluidized bed. The modeling predictions compared reasonably well with experimental data and qualitative slugging regime. The simulation results can better predict the slugging fluidization characterization of large particles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 881-883)

Pages:

689-697

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Gidaspow: Multiphase Flow and Fluidization( Academic press, London, UK, 1st edition, 1994), p.56.

Google Scholar

[2] S . Benyahia, H. Arastoopour and T. M. Knowlton: Powder Technology, Vol. 112 (2000)No. 1-2, p.24.

Google Scholar

[3] V. Mathiesen, T. Solberg and B. H. Hjertager: International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 26(2000) No. 3, p.387.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Li: Lagrange Simulation of Flow Structure Formation and Evolution in Dense Gas-Solid Flows (Doctoral Dissertation, Twente University, the Netherlands, 2002), p.36.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Tsuji, T. Tanaka and S. Yonemura: Powder Technology, Vol. 95 (1998) No. 3, p.254.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Schmidt, U. Renz: International Journal Thermodynamics Science, Vol. 39 (2000) No. 9-11, p.871.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Horio, Y. Iwadate and T. Sugaya: Powder Technology, Vol. 96 (1998) No. 2, p.148.

Google Scholar

[8] T. B. Anderson and R. Jackson: Industry Engineering Chemical Fundamental, Vol. 6(1967) No. 4, p.527.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Jackson: Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 52 (1997) No. 15, p.2457.

Google Scholar

[10] C. C. Pain, S. Mansoorzadeh and C.R.E. de Oliveira: International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 27 (2001) No. 3, p.527.

Google Scholar

[11] N. M. Catipovic, G. N. Jovanovic and T. J. Fitzgerald: AIChE Journal, Vol. 24 (1978) No. 3, p.543.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Baeyens and D. Geldart: Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 29 (1974) No. 1, p.255.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Satija and L. -S. Fan: AIChE Journal, Vol. 31 (1985) No. 9, p.1554.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Taitel: International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 12 (1986) No. 2, p.203.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Ahmadzadeh, H. Arastoopour and F. Teymour: Industry of Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 42 (2003) No. 12, p.2627.

Google Scholar

[16] L. Huilin, D. Gidaspow and J. Bouillard: Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 95 (2003) No. 1-3, p.1.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Zimmermann and F. Taghipour: Industry of Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 44 (2005) No. 26, p.9818.

Google Scholar

[18] M. Syamlal and T. J. O'Brien: AIChE Symposium Series, Vol. 85 (1989) No. 270, p.22.

Google Scholar

[19] D. G. Schaeffer: Journal Differential Equations, Vol. 66 (1987) No. 3, p.19.

Google Scholar

[20] C. K. K. Lun, S. B. Savage and D. J. Jeffrey: Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 140 (1984) No. 3, p.

Google Scholar