Protective Effect of Ginsenoside Rb1 Mixing with Several Lung Flush Solutions on Pulmonary Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the protective effects of ginsenoside Rb1 mixed with LPD compared to mixed with several other lung flush solutions on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Method: Three group of rabbit lungs were perfused with three kinds of mixtures of ginsenoside Rb1 with blood, Euro-Collins solution(EC) or low-potassium-dextran solution(LPD) respectively, then lung dry/wet weight ratio and malondiadehyde(MAD) were examined and histological changes were observed. Result: Lung dry/wet weight ratio of LPD and Rb1 group was higher than that of EC and Rb1 and blood and Rb1 groups, whereas MAD of LPD and Rb1 group was significantly less than that of EC and Rb1 and blood and Rb1 groups（P<0.05）. Histological findings showed less damage in LPD and Rb1 group. Conclusion: Ginsenoside Rb1 mixed with LPD shows a better protective effect on pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury compared with other mixtures.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 884-885)
• Pages: 625-629
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.884-885.625
• Online since: January 2014
• Authors: Feng Wu Lin, Chuan Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Kun Peng Cheng, Nan Gao, Zhen Guo Han, Yan Zhao*
• Keywords: Ginsenoside Rb1, Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Pulmonary Protection

References

[1] Meyers BF, Lynch J, Trulock EP, et al: Lung transplantation: a decade of experience. Ann Surg 230: 362, (1999).

[2] Trulock EP, Edwards LB, Taylor DO, Boucek MM, Keck BM, Hertz MI. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report—2006. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25: 880-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.001

[3] Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM, et al: The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: fifteenth official report—1998. J Heart Lung Transplant 17: 656, (1998).

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-585-29191-8_6

[4] Christie JD, Bavaria JE, Palevsky HI, et al: Primary graft failure following lung transplantation. Chest 114: 51, (1998).

DOI: 10.1378/chest.114.1.51

[5] Novick RJ, Gehman KE, Ali IS, et al: Lung preservation: the importance of endothelial and alveolar type II cell integrity. Ann Thorac Surg 62: 302, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00333-5

[6] Pizanis N, Petrov A, Heckmann J, et al. A new preservation solution for lung transplantation: evaluation in a porcine transplantation model. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012 Mar; 31(3): 310-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.11.009

[7] Marosco SF, Bailey M, Mcglade D, et al. Effect of donor preservation solution and survival in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30: 414–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.10.002

[8] Ganesh JS, Rogers CA, Banner NR, et al. Does the method of lung preservation influence outcome after transplantation?An analysis of 681 consecutive procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 1313-21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.030

[9] Okada Y, Kondo T. Preservation solution for lung transplantation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surgery. 2009 Dec; 57(12): 635-9.

DOI: 10.1007/s11748-009-0492-3

[10] Zhang JT, The comparison of pharmacological effects of ginsenoside Rg1 and that of Rb1[J]. Basic & Clinical Medicine, 2000, 20(5): 388-390.

[11] Marasco, SF, Bailey M, McGlade D, et al. Effect of donor preservation solution and survival in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011 Apr; 30(4): 414-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.10.002