Different Rootstocks and Physiological and Biochemical Change of SUM Cherry in Greenhouse Environment

Fa Hui Liang; Jing Hui Yang; Jian Ke Li; Yan Jun Liu; Jun Xun Huang; Hui Jie Xu; Wu Que Gong; Ting Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.886.304

Paper Titles

On Evaluation Model of Green Technology Innovation Capability of Pulp and Paper Enterprise Based on Support Vector Machines
p.285

Selection and Application of Green Packaging Materials
p.289

Growth and Development of Feijoa with Different Plant Shape and in Greenhouses Environment
p.294

Biological Species and Environment Study on Overwintering Protection of Raspberries and Blackberries and their Growing and Development
p.299

Different Rootstocks and Physiological and Biochemical Change of SUM Cherry in Greenhouse Environment
p.304

Growth Effects of Pb stress on Seedling of Lactuca sativa L. and Brassica campestris L.ssp
p.309

Environment Effects of Tuberose Forcing Culture by Different Planting Dates and Varieties
p.314

On the Rigid-Lid Hypothesis Application to the Flow Simulation of Step-Feed A/O Process
p.319

Velocity and Sludge Distribution Simulation of the Aerobic Tank of Step-Feed A/O Process
p.323

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 886Different Rootstocks and Physiological and...

Different Rootstocks and Physiological and Biochemical Change of SUM Cherry in Greenhouse Environment

Abstract:

To understand the effects of different rootstocks on the growth of sweet cherry in greenhouse environment, The change of physiological and biochemical indexes of SUM variety grafted on dwarf stock (gisela 5) and the vigorous stock (mahaleb) was studied with biennial seedlings cultivated in greenhouse of north China. The results showed that dwarf stocks could increase content of Malonaldehyde (MDA), proline (PRO), activity of Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and decreased the membrane relative permeability in the leaves of SUM compared with vigorous rootstocks. So the dwarf stocks could increase the resistance of plants. The vigorous stock could decrease content of MDA, but the activity of Peroxidase (POD) was same in the leaves of SUM grafted on both of rootstocks. So, the dwarf rootstock should be better than vigorous stock on increasing resistance or drought and salt tolerance of the cherry varieties SUM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Research on Material Science, Environment Science and Computer Science III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 886)

Pages:

304-308

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.886.304

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Fa Hui Liang, Jing Hui Yang*, Jian Ke Li, Yan Jun Liu, Jun Xun Huang, Hui Jie Xu, Wu Que Gong, Ting Liu

Keywords:

Dwarf Rootstock, Enzyme Activity, Resistance, Sweet Cherry, Vigorous Rootstock

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Anastasia Schepers: Environmental Nutrition Vol. 31 (2008), p.8.

Google Scholar

[2] E Lori Zanteson: Environmental Nutrition Vol. 35 (2012), p.8.

Google Scholar

[3] Bo-Bae Lee & Mi-Ran Cha & Soo-Yeon Kim & Eunju Park & Hae-Ryong Park & Seung-Cheol Lee: Plant Foods Hum Nutr Vol. 62 (2007), pp.79-84.

Google Scholar

[4] Jung HA, Kim AR, Chung HY, Choi JS: Arch Pharm Res Vol. 25 (2002), pp.865-872.

Google Scholar

[5] U. Erturk , N. Sivritepe, C. Yerlikaya, M. Bor, F. Ozkemir and I. Turkan: Biologia Plantarum Vol. 51(2007), pp.597-600.

DOI: 10.1007/s10535-007-0132-7

Google Scholar

[6] Jef Vercammen, Guy Van Daele and Toon Vanrykel: Scientific Works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian University of Agreicuture Sodininkystė IR Daržininkystė Vol. 25(2006), pp.218-223.

Google Scholar

[7] Lynn E. Long and Clive Kaiser: A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication Vol. 61(2010), pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Gerçekçioğlu, Ç. Çekiç: Seeds. Turk. J. Agric. For. Vol. 23(1999), pp.145-150.

Google Scholar

[9] M. A. Moreno, L. Montanes, M.C. Tabuenca, R. Cambra: Hort. Sci. Vol. 65 (1996), pp.85-91.

Google Scholar

[10] Ali Reza Daneshvar Hosseini: Archives of Applied Science Research Vol. 3 (2011), pp.118-125.

Google Scholar

[11] Hesheng Li, Qun Sun, Shijie Zhao: Higher Education Press, China, (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] BlokhimaO B, Virolainen E, FagetstedtK V, HoikkalaA, WahalaK, Chirkova TV: Physiologia Plantarum Vol. 109(2000), pp.396-403.

Google Scholar

[13] Xinhua Chen, Baojing Guo, Jing Zhao: Anhui Agriculture science Vol. 37(2009), pp.4958-4959.

Google Scholar

[14] Chuang Wang, Xiuwu Guo, Yanli Hu: Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science Vol. 14(2008), pp.167-172.

Google Scholar

[15] Dandan Wang, Jinghui Yang, Jianke Li: Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University Vol. 19(2012), pp.24-26.

Google Scholar