Environment Effects of Tuberose Forcing Culture by Different Planting Dates and Varieties

Jing Hui Yang; Ting Liu; Jian Ke Li; Yan Jun Liu; Jun Xun Huang; Wu Que Gong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.886.314

Paper Titles

Growth and Development of Feijoa with Different Plant Shape and in Greenhouses Environment
p.294

Biological Species and Environment Study on Overwintering Protection of Raspberries and Blackberries and their Growing and Development
p.299

Different Rootstocks and Physiological and Biochemical Change of SUM Cherry in Greenhouse Environment
p.304

Growth Effects of Pb stress on Seedling of Lactuca sativa L. and Brassica campestris L.ssp
p.309

Environment Effects of Tuberose Forcing Culture by Different Planting Dates and Varieties
p.314

On the Rigid-Lid Hypothesis Application to the Flow Simulation of Step-Feed A/O Process
p.319

Velocity and Sludge Distribution Simulation of the Aerobic Tank of Step-Feed A/O Process
p.323

Application of Different Biomaterials in Achilles Tendon Repair for Exercise Injury
p.329

Hydroxycamptothecin Stealth Liposomes: Containing TPGS as a Novel PEGylated Long-Circulating Coating Material
p.333

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 886Environment Effects of Tuberose Forcing Culture by...

Environment Effects of Tuberose Forcing Culture by Different Planting Dates and Varieties

Abstract:

In the northern China, Tuberose is planted in spring following man-forced dormancy in winter and blooms in summer or autumn. The forcing culture was carried out under greenhouse environment to advance blooming to spring and to evaluate the vegetative and reproductive characteristics of tuberose. Effects of three planting dates (30th Oct., 30th Nov, and 20th Dec), two cultivars (Single and Double) were determined. The results showed that Oct planting gave more percentage of corm sprouting, longer spikes and flower stems, more but smaller florets; however, more number of days was required to bloom than other planting dates. Double variety normally had more sprouting, flowering, florets, shorter spikes, and better quality of cutting flower, but it bloomed later than Single variety. The quality of cutting flowers produced in the greenhouse was decreased compared with local field produced flowers, particularly when planting date was late, with the exception of Double in Oct planting. So, the forcing cultivation of tuberose may be performed with Double and in Oct planting in local greenhouse and without man-forced winter dormancy of corm after harvest.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Research on Material Science, Environment Science and Computer Science III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 886)

Pages:

314-318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.886.314

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Jing Hui Yang*, Ting Liu, Jian Ke Li, Yan Jun Liu, Jun Xun Huang, Wu Que Gong

Keywords:

Characteristic of Flower, Flowering Time, Quality of Cutting Flower, Winter Planting

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] M. A. Anjum, F. Naveed, F. Shakeel, and S. Amin: J. Res. Sci., Vol. 12 (2001), pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Asif, M. Qasim, and G. Mustafa: International journal of biology (Int. J. Agri. Biol. ) Vol. 3 (2001), pp.291-292.

Google Scholar

[3] V. C. Pawar, and V. S. Thaker: World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 23 (2007), pp.1099-1106.

Google Scholar

[4] Hamma I. L.: International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research, Vol. 1 (2013), pp.22-26.

Google Scholar

[5] R.I. Khobragade, M.M. Damke, B.J. Jadhao, and C.V. Heddau: PKV Research Journal, Vol. 21 (1997), pp.44-47.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Mubhopadhayay, and G.J. Banker, Indian Agriculturist, Vol. 25 (1981), pp.131-134.

Google Scholar

[7] Jinghui Yang, Huijie Xu, Jianke Li, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 788 (2013), pp.329-333.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. P. Chang, S. F. Ding, C.C. Chou, B.S. Du, and W.S. Chen: Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica Taipei, Vol. 39 (1998), pp.199-203.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Rohde, T. Ruttink, V. Hostyn, L. Sterck, K.V. Driessche, and W. Boerjan: Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 58 (2007), pp.4047-4060.

DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm261

Google Scholar

[10] V. V. Kondrat'eva, M. V. Semenova, T. V. Voronkova, and N. N. Danilinam: Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 56 (2009), pp.428-435.

Google Scholar

[11] V. Kumar; S K. Bhattacharjee, Suchitra; K. P. Singh: Journal of Applied Horticulture, Vol. 5 (2003), pp.16-20.

Google Scholar

[12] A.E. Moftah and A.I. Al-Humaid, J. King Saud Univ., Agric. Sci., Vol. 18 (2006), pp.127-139.

Google Scholar

[13] P.K. Mane, G.J. Bankar and S.S. Makne: Indian J. Agric. Res., Vol. 41 (2007), pp.71-74.

Google Scholar