Technology Study on the Different Cognitive Process of Stereopsis between Crossed and Uncrossed Fine Disparity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considerable improvements in display technology were made in stereoscopic imaging and image quality rose with technical progress. But there was not enough effort on reducing visual fatigue. The study was to investigate one of the ways to reduce visual fatigue caused by three-dimensional images. Static random-dot stereograms (RDS) were used as stimuli. The performance of every subject was recorded with disparate disparities of 3.27', 6.54', 8.18', 11.45', 14.72', 17.99', 21.26', and 24.53'. Results showed that reaction times were always longer in the uncrossed disparities relative to the crossed disparities. For crossed disparities, human visual system was the most sensitive to the images with disparity of 6.54'. As to uncrossed disparities, human visual system was the most sensitive to the images with disparity of 8.18'.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

374-377

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Parker A J, Cumming B G. Cortical mechanisms of binocular stereoscopic vision [J]. Progress in brain research, 2001, 134: 205-216.

DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)34015-3

Google Scholar

[2] Tyler C W. A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams [J]. Vision research, 1990, 30(11): 1877-1895.

DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90165-h

Google Scholar

[3] Richards W. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception [J]. JOSA, 1971, 61(3): 410-414.

Google Scholar

[4] Poggio G F, Gonzalez F, Krause F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity [J]. The Journal of neuroscience, 1988, 8(12): 4531-4550.

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.08-12-04531.1988

Google Scholar

[5] Cheng L H , Yao G Z, Liu L. Noise tolerance in human stereopsis [J]. Journal of Psychology, 1985, 3: 304-311.

Google Scholar

[6] Becker S, Bowd C, Shorter S, King K, Patterson R. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays [J]. Vision research, 1999, 39(2): 331-339.

DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00110-2

Google Scholar

[7] Feng C L. A study of the total number of the human cones and the distribution at the area centralis. Fudan university, (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] Yan S M. Digital stereoscopic Test Charts. People's medical publishing house, (1985).

Google Scholar