Reverse Design from Virtual Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to present the advantages and the vision of Reverse Design from virtual manufacturing. With the reverse design method, the real geometry after manufacturing process (by simulation) was predicted. In the first part of the study, comparisons were made between difference cases (the injection position and the amount of the pin gates). Based on the results from simulation, it is clear that 4 pin gates are better choice. In the second part, under the 4 pin gates working condition, considering the warp from the injection molding process, the actual minimum gap between the fan and the frame after assembly is smaller than the original designed gap. Therefore, to get the ideal product to keep the designed gap between the fan the frame, the radius of the fan should be reduced or the radius of the frame should be increased. While in other case, which was simulated with 3 pin gates, the real gap is larger than the original gap. Therefore, to get the ideal product, the radius of the fan should be increased or the radius of the frame should be reduced. In conclusion, original designed parameters could be modified, with the help of virtual manufacturing (by simulation) to make the assembly more accurately efficiently.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 889-890)

Pages:

113-118

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Varady, R.R. Martin, J. Cox – Reverse engineering of geometric models – An introduction (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Z.M. Bi , Lihui Wang – Advances in 3D data acquisition and processing for industrial applications, Robotics and Computer- ntegrated Manufacturing 26 (2010) 403–413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.003

Google Scholar

[3] István Németha, János Püspökia, Csaba Haraszkóa, Gyula Mátyásia, Tibor Nagya, Christopher Freemanb, Robin W. Scottb, James S. Baldwinb – 3D Design Support for Rapid Virtual Prototyping of Manufacturing Systems, Forty Sixth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] Philippe Dépincé, Damien Chablat (1), Peer-Oliver Woelk - Virual Manufacturing: Tools for improving Design and Production (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] Marinov V – What Virtual Manufacturing is? Part I: Definition, 13 October (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] Markus C. Becker, Pasquale Salvatore, Francesco Zirpoli – The impact of virtual simulation tools on problem-solving and new product development organization, Research Policy 34 (2005) 1305–1321.

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.016

Google Scholar

[7] Erik Lindskoga*, Jonatan Berglunda, Johan Vallhagenb, Björn Johanssona – Visualization support for virtual redesign of manufacturing systems (2013).

Google Scholar

[8] Marcello Colledania, Giulia Pedriellia, b, Walter Terkajb, Marcello Urgoa – Integrated Virtual Platform for Manufacturing Systems Design, 46th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] L. Xinmin, L. Zhongqin, H. Tian, Z. Ziping – A study of a reverse engineering system based on vision sensor for free from surfaces (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(01)00022-5

Google Scholar