Relation between Sulfate Reducing Bacterium and Environmental Factors in Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Site

Article Preview

Abstract:

The sulfate reducing bacterium (SRB) diversity of all samples were analyzed by PCR-DGGE technology and the Shannon-Wiener indexes (1.004-3.665) of all the samples were calculated. The results showed that the abundances, advantages and evenness of the sulfate-reducing bacterial community of all the samples showed certain change regularity along the pollution halo direction. The results of CCA analysis showed that the distribution and structure of sulfate reducing bacterium communities showed obvious correlation with the concentration of TPH, DO and other environmental factors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 889-890)

Pages:

1621-1624

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Alexander M. Biodegradation and bioremediation. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; (1999).

Google Scholar

[2] Maier RM, Pepper IL, Gerba CP. Environmental microbiology. London: Academic Press; (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Margesin R, Schinner F. Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in ex-treme environments (mini-review). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001; 56: 650–663.

DOI: 10.1007/s002530100701

Google Scholar

[4] Greer CW, Whyte LG, Niederberger TD. Microbial communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated temperate, tropical, alpine, and polar soils. In: Timmis KN, editor. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010. p.2313.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_168

Google Scholar

[5] Spiegelman D, Whissell G, Greer CW. A survey of the methods for the characterization of microbial consortia and communities. Can J Microbiol 2005; 51: 355–386.

DOI: 10.1139/w05-003

Google Scholar

[6] Lakay FM, Botha A, Prior BA (2007) Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils. J Appl Microbiol 102(1): 265–273.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03052.x

Google Scholar