A Nonlinear Transformation Field Procedure for Periodic Masonry Based on an Equivalent Cosserat Medium

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper deals with the problem of the determination of the in-plane behavior of periodic masonry material. The masonry is considered as a composite material obtained as a regular distribution of blocks connected by horizontal and vertical mortar joints. The macromechanical equivalent Cosserat medium is derived by a rational homogenization procedure based on the Transformation Field Analysis. The micromechanical analysis is developed considering a Cauchy model for the masonry components. In particular, linear elastic constitutive relationship is considered for the blocks, while nonlinear constitutive law is adopted for the mortar joints, accounting for the damage and friction phenomena occurring during the loading history. Numerical applications are performed in order to assess the performances of the proposed procedure in reproducing the mechanical behavior of the masonry material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 89-91)

Pages:

6-11

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Luciano, E. Sacco: Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 32-24 (1997), p.3191.

Google Scholar

[2] T.J. Massart, R.H. J Peerlings and M.G.D. Geers: Int. J. Numerical Methods Engng., Vol. 69-5 (2007), p.1022.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Brasile, R. Casciaro and G. Formica: Comp. Methods Applied Mechanics Engng, Vol. 196 (2007), p.4934.

Google Scholar

[4] V. Kouznetsova, M.G.D. Geers and W.A.M. Brekelmans: Int. J. Numerical Methods Engng, 54 (2002), p.1235.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Forest, K. Sab: Mechanics Research Comm. Numerical Methods Engng, Vol. 4 (1998), p.449.

Google Scholar

[6] O. Van der Sluis, P.H.J. Vosbeek, P.J.G. Schreurs and H.E. H Meijer: Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 36 (1999), p.3193.

Google Scholar

[7] G.J. Dvorak: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 437 (1992), p.311.

Google Scholar

[8] J.C. Michel, P. Suquet: Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 40 (2003), p.6937.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Sacco: Eur. J. Mechanics. A, Solids, Vol. 28 (2009), p.209.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Trovalusci, R. Masiani: Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 40-5 (2003), p.1281 Fig. 2: Shear test: comparison between the proposed results and the FEA solution. Fig. 3: Shear test: comparison between the proposed results and the FEA solution.

Google Scholar