Pseudo Fatigue Testing for Rapid Certification to Service

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aircraft full-scale fatigue tests are expensive to conduct and they are a critical item on the certification path of any aircraft design or modification. Two aspects that contribute to the cost of a test are its duration and the loads spectrum development process. This paper provides a summary of a proposed supplemental pseudo full-scale fatigue test (FSFT) aimed at rapid certification. In this instance the method was developed with the aid of extant FSFTs that were found to be deficient. The proposed process involves the development of proof loads, damage size estimates, a loads application rig, insertion of the target damage or modifications and conducting proof testing. As all locations with a propensity to crack are known, the process is considered to be the equivalent of having conducted a representative fatigue test for the required service life target and then demonstrating adequate residual strength (i.e. proof testing the damage state at the end of a FSFT).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1059-1064

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kloeden, R. Hornet Outer Wing StAtic Testing (HOWSAT) Design Plan, Technical Report ASI/A21/05/007 DAIRENG, Directorate General Technical Airworthiness - Australian Defence Force. (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] DAVENG-DGTA. F/A-18 A/B Hornet, Aircraft structural integrity management plan, Volume 2, DGTA-ADF fU545789. May (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] Ministry of Defence, Design and Airworthiness Requirements for Service Aircraft, Defence Standard 00-970, AL13, Chapter 201, dated Oct (1987).

Google Scholar

[4] Rutledge RS, Hiscocks RJ, Christie A, Leblanc R. and Cloutier S. CF-18 IFOSTP FT245 wing test: final report and damage summary. LTR-SMPL-2009-0160. NRC-CNRC, Canada, Sept (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] Molent L, Barter SA and Wanhill RJH. The lead crack fatigue lifing framework, Fatigue 2011; 33; 323–331.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.009

Google Scholar

[6] Choi J, Mongru D and White P. F/A–18 Hornet Outer Wing StAtic Test (HOWSAT) – loads development, DSTO–TR–2619, Nov (2011).

Google Scholar