Cost Effective Safety from Full System Teardowns

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes techniques for affordable teardowns on aircraft to extract condition data for assessment of system integrity durability and damage tolerance. Studies of fleet accidents show a significant proportion are due to failures in systems other than structures and engines but knowledge of their degradation with usage and age are less well understood. Forensic results from a full teardown provide robust data that supplement design and service data to support safety assessments. Fleet retirement is a golden opportunity to carry out a full system teardown if it is cost-effective. This permits a condition assessment of all critical systems after decades of Australianspecific configuration, roles and environment. Rapid dismantling techniques that do not destroy key information are being refined. Performance measurements are being compared with original design specifications and forensic data can be compared with non-destructive inspection data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1084-1089

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] www. adf-serials. com, accessed 20 September, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] AAP 7001. 048 (AM1) – Defence Aviation Safety Program Manual.

Google Scholar

[3] AAP 7001. 053 Technical Airworthiness Manual, Sept (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] AAP 7001. 054 Airworthiness Design Requirements Manual.

Google Scholar

[5] AAP 7001. 059 ADF Aviation Maintenance Management Manual, Mar (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] Boykett, Goodwin, Ageing Aircraft Systems Audit – fighting the ageing process, AIAC14, 2011, Australia.

Google Scholar

[7] Reed, S. The Role of R&D in Support of the UK MOD's Fleet of Ageing Aircraft. in Aircraft Airworthiness & Sustainment Conf. 2010. Texas, USA.

Google Scholar

[8] DoD, JSSG-2006 Joint Services Specification Guide Aircraft Structures. 1998, US Department of Defense.

Google Scholar

[9] MoD, DEF-STAN 00-970, Design and Airworthiness Requirements for Service Aircraft. 2003, UK Ministry of Defence.

Google Scholar

[10] Anon, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents, Worldwide Operations 1959-2009. 2010, Boeing Commercial Airplanes.

Google Scholar

[11] MoD, JAP100A-01 Chapter 16. 4. 2, Ageing Aircraft Systems Audit. 2010, UK Ministry of Defence.

Google Scholar

[12] DoD, MIL-STD-1798B Mechanical Equipment and Subsystem Integrity Program, US Department of Defense, Editor. (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] TTCP Teardown Protocol jointly developed by DSTO, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] Haddon-Cave, C.Q., The NIMROD Review: An Independent Review into the Broader Issues Surrounding the Loss of the RAF NIMROD MR2 Aircraft XV230 in Afghanistan in 2006, UK House of Commons, Editor. 2009, London: The Stationery Office.

Google Scholar