Fatigue in Railway Components - Understanding vs. Resolution

Abstract:

The consequences of surface finish and decarburization on the fatigue performance of cast and forged steel components in the railway industry is substantial, and means that fatigue cracking is an ongoing issue across the industry. Examples of loading spectra for coupler forces and track loads are presented, along with data from past investigations showing the severe penalty in terms of fatigue life caused by inadequate surface finish at critical locations of components under fatigue loads. Managers in railway industry need to understand the technical case for increased manufacturing requirements, as costs from operational losses may well have made the economic case for increased requirements more compelling. Various options for improving the surface finish at critical locations that are prone to fatigue are available, and should be explored to reduce the vulnerability of these components to failure via fatigue cracking.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 1163-1168
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1163
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: John M. Cookson*, Peter J. Mutton
• Keywords: Decarburization, Fatigue, Railway, Steel

References

[1] R.W. Clyne Some Fatigue Problems of the Railroad Industry, Metals and Alloys, 10 (1939), 316-323.

[2] G. A Hankins and M.L. Becker The Effect of Surface Conditions by Heat Treatment on the Fatigue Resistance of Spring Steels, J. Iron and Steel Institute, 2 (1931), 387-460.

[3] S.A. McKelvey and A. Fatemi Surface Finish Effect on the Fatigue Behavior of Forged Steel, International Journal of Fatigue 36 (2012) 130-145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.008

[4] The Effect of Heat Treatment on Fatigue Lifetime and Impact Durability of Heat Treated Cast Steel Railroad Components, S Vaidyanathan, Ph.D. Thesis, IIT (1985).

[5] R. Maino and J.F. Wallace, Fatigue Behaviour of Various Grades of Steel Castings and the Influence of Cast Surfaces, Steel Founders Society of America, (1979), 439-476.

[6] Association of American Railroads Standard M-211 Couplers and Yokes, AAR Approved-Purchase and Acceptance, (2003).

[7] AAR MSRP Section CII "Design Fabrication and Construction of Freight Cars, Chapter 7, (1988).

[8] J.M. Cookson, A MacNish and M Baartz, Fatigue Cracking and Stresses in Yokes in Heavy Haul Service, Proc International Heavy Haul Conference (IHHA 2013), New Delhi, India.

[9] P.J. Mutton, C. Thomson, M. Hanna, S. Oswald and L. Wessels, Comparative Assessment of Insulated Rail Joint Assemblies, Proc. CORE2012, Brisbane, RTSA.

[10] A. Mayers, M. Dhanasekar, Measurement of In-service Insulated Rail Joint Tie Plate Response, Proc. Conference on Railway Engineering (CORE2012), Brisbane, RTSA.

[11] K.C. Arcus & J.M. Cookson "Use of Ultrasonic Phased Array Testing for Detection of Cracks and Defects in Heavy Haul Draft Gear, Proceedings IHHA 2011, Calgary, Canada.