A Flexible HCF Modeling Framework Leading to a Probabilistic Multiaxial Kitagawa-Takahashi Diagram

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article describes a flexible modeling framework which leads to the construction of a probabilistic, multiaxial Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram. This framework has been developed following experimental observations that clearly indicate that two independent fatigue damage mechanisms can be activated, at the same time, in metallic materials. Specifically, one damage mechanism is associated with crack initiation and the other with crack arrest. It is postulated that these damage mechanisms are more appropriately modeled using two different fatigue criteria or, more specifically, two completely different approaches to fatigue (i.e. a classical multiaxial fatigue criterion and a LEFM type criterion). Hence, the proposed modeling framework provides the possibility of combining any two suitable criteria, in a probabilistic framework based on the weakest link hypothesis and results in the continuous description of the Kitagawa diagram for any multiaxial stress state. It is shown that under certain conditions this approach is equivalent to the classical El Haddad approach to the short crack problem encountered in LEFM. However, the proposed framework is easily extended to multiaxial loading conditions. This modeling framework is demonstrated in detail via its application to multiaxial fatigue data for data taken from the literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1372-1378

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Kitagawa, S. Takahashi, Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks. In: ASM Proceedings of 2nd international conference on mechanical behaviour of materials, Metalspark, Ohio, (1976), p.62731.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Pessard, F. Morel, A. Morel, The anisotropic fatigue behavior of forged steel, Adv Engng Mater (2009), 11, p.732–5.

DOI: 10.1002/adem.200900040

Google Scholar

[3] W. Weibull, A statistical distribution function of wide applicability, ASME J Appl Mech (1951), 18, p.293–7.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Fatemi, D.F. Socie, Critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct (1988), 11–3, p.149–65.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x

Google Scholar

[5] B. Crossland, Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Int conf on fatigue of metals, London (1956).

Google Scholar

[6] K. Dang Van, Sur la résistance á la fatigue des métau,. Sci Tech Armement, (1973) 47.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Charkaluk, A. Constantinescu, H. Matournam, K. Dang Van, Revisiting the Dang Van criterion. Proc Engng, (2009), 1–1, p.143–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2009.06.033

Google Scholar

[8] A.M. Freudenthal, In: H. Liebowitz, editor. Fracture, vol. 2, New York: Academic Press, (1968), p.591–619.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Murakami, Metal fatigue: effects of small defects and non-metallic inclusion, London, Elsevier, (2002).

Google Scholar

[10] E. Pessard, D. Bellett, F. Morel, I. Koutiri, A mechanistic approach to the Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram using a multiaxial probabilistic framework, Eng Fract Mech, 109, (2013), pp.89-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.06.001

Google Scholar

[11] M.H. El Haddad, T.H. Topper, K.N. Smith, Prediction of non propagating cracks, Engng Fract Mech, (1979), 11, p.573–84.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-x

Google Scholar

[12] A.J. McEvily, M. Endo, S. Ishihara, The influence of biaxial stress on the fatigue behaviour of defect-containing steels. ICF1, (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] T. Billaudeau, Y. Nadot, G. Bezine, Multiaxial fatigue limit for defective materials: mechanisms and experiments, Acta Materialia, (2004), vol 52, pp.3911-3920.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.006

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Nadot, T. Billaudeau, Multiaxial fatigue limit criterion for defective materials, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, (2006), vol. 73-1, pp.112-133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.06.005

Google Scholar

[15] L. Flaceliere, F. Morel, A. Dragon, Competition between mesoplasticity and damage under HCF Elasticity/damage shakedown concept, Int J Fatigue, (2007), vol. 29, pp.2281-2297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.001

Google Scholar

[16] F. Morel and N. Huyen, Plasticity and damage heterogeneity in fatigue, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, (2008), vol. 49-1, pp.98-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2007.10.006

Google Scholar

[17] M. Endo, I. Ishimoto, The fatigue strength of steels containing small holes under out-of-phase combined loading, Int J Fatigue, (2006), 28, p.592–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.013

Google Scholar