Fatigue Crack Closure due to Surface Roughness and Plastic Deformation

Abstract:

Crack closure is an important factor affecting fatigue crack growth in high strength alloy materials. Plasticity is known to be the main driver of closure, but in some materials and at some stages other mechanisms such as fracture surface roughness and debris accumulation are also important. Analytical models based on the plasticity induced closure concept have been very successful in correlating fatigue crack growth rates and lives for a range of materials under constant amplitude and spectrum loading. However, extreme values of plastic constraint factors, significantly lower than those determined from three dimensional finite element studies on similar geometry, are needed to achieve good correlation with experimental results, particularly for materials which exhibit rough and tortuous fatigue surfaces. One such material investigated here is β-annealed Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. The aim of this paper is to further develop, apply and evaluate a crack closure model which combines roughness and plasticity induced closure, incorporating experimental measurements of fracture surface roughness from tests on Eccentrically Loaded Single Edge-Notch Tension (ESE(T)) specimens. The model was first proposed by Zhang et al. 2002 for short cracks in 2000 series Aluminium Alloy. The model was evaluated here for physically longer cracks in the Titanium Alloy material. Accurate surface profile and roughness measurements were made using an optical 3-D profiler with a vertical resolution of better than 0.15 μm. Verification of the proposed model was carried out by comparing the model prediction with the closure measurements by back-face strain compliance using the pin-loaded ESE(T) specimens. Results from the roughness model were then compared with results from the FASTRAN analytical crack closure code. Analysis using this new approach, with plastic constraint factors more closely aligned with the values determined from independent classical and three dimensional finite element studies, provide a solid basis from which to implement the approach in FASTRAN.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 319-324
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.319
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: Kevin Walker, Chun H. Wang, Jim C. Newman Junior
• Keywords: Closure, Crack, Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG), Fracture Surface Roughness, Plasticity, Spectrum Loading

References

[1] Elber, W., Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1970. 2: pp.37-45.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7

[2] Elber, W., The significance of fatigue crack closure. ASTM STP 486 American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 1971: pp.230-242.

[3] Walker, K., The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum, in Effects of Environment and Complex Load History of Fatigue Life, ASTM STP 462. 1970. pp.1-14.

DOI: 10.1520/stp32032s

[4] Newman, et al., Small-crack growth and fatigue life predictions for high-strength aluminium alloys. Part II: crack closure and fatigue analyses. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2000. 23(1): pp.59-72.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00242.x

[5] Newman Jr, J.C., E.P. Phillips, and M.H. Swain, Fatigue-life prediction methodology using small-crack theory. International Journal of Fatigue, 1999. 21(2): pp.109-119.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(98)00058-9

[6] Newman, J.C., Jr., A crack-closure model for predicting fatigue crack growth under aircraft spectrum loading, in Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth under Random Loading, ASTM STP 748, J.B. Chang and C.M. Hudson, Editors. 1981, ASTM. pp.53-84.

DOI: 10.1520/stp28334s

[7] Walker, N., and Beevers, C.J., A Fatigue Crack Closure Mechanism in Titanium. Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures, 1979. 1: pp.135-148.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00372.x

[8] Paris, P.C., Bucci, R.J., Wessel, E.T., Clark, W.G., and Mager, T.R., Extensive Study of Low Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in A533 and A508 Steels, in 1971 National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics. 1972, ASTM STP 513.

DOI: 10.1520/stp34119s

[9] Newman, J.C., Jr., FASTRAN. A fatigue crack growth life prediction code based on the crack-closure concept. Version 5. 3. User Guide. 2010, Fatigue and Fracture Associates LLC.

[10] Newman, J.C., Jr., Analyses of Fatigue Crack Growth Databases for Use in a Damage Tolerance Approach for Aircraft Propellers and Rotorcraft. 2007(DOT/FAA/AR-07/49).

[11] Newman, J.C., Jr., Yamada, Y., and Newman, J. A., Crack-closure behaviour of 7050 aluminum alloy near threshold conditions for wide range in load ratios and constant Kmax tests. Journal of ASTM International, 2010. 7(4).

DOI: 10.1520/jai102490

[12] Wang, C.H., L.R.F. Rose, and J.C. Newman, Closure of plane-strain cracks under large-scale yielding conditions. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2002. 25(2): pp.127-139.

DOI: 10.1046/j.8756-758x.2002.00483.x

[13] Christian, M., Overview of the Full Scale Durability Tests on F-35 Lightning II Program, in The Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference. 2012: San Antonio Texas USA.

[14] Wanhill, R.J.H., and Barter, S.A., Fatigue of beta processed and beta heat-treated titanium alloys. 2012: Springer.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2524-9

[15] Walker, K.F., and Newman, J.C., Jr., A new approach to determine near-threshold fatigue crack growth rate properties in high strength coarse-grain titanium alloy with rough and torturous fatigue surfaces, in 27th ICAF Symposium. 2013: Jerusalem, Israel.

DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12148

[16] Newman, J.C., Jr., Bigelow, C.A., and Shivakumar, K.N., Three-dimansional elastic-plastic finite-element analyses of constraint variations in cracked bodies. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1993. 46(1): pp.1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90299-8

[17] Elber, W., Crack-closure and crack growth measurements in surface-flawed titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, NASA, Editor. (1975).

[18] Zhang, X.P., Li, J. C., Wang, C. H., Ye, L., and Mai, Y. W., Prediction of short fatigue crack propagation behaviour by characterization of both plasticity and roughness induced crack closures. International Journal of Fatigue, 2002. 24(5): pp.529-536.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00161-x

[19] D.S. Dugdale, Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1960. 8(2): pp.100-104.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2

[20] Suresh, S., and Ritchie, R.O., A geometric Model for Fatigue CRack Closure Induced by Surface Roughness. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1982. 13A(9).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02644803

[21] Chang, C.C., and Mear, M., A boundary element method for two-dimensional linear elastic fracture analysis. International Journal of Fracture, 1996. 74: pp.219-251.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00033829

[22] Kim, J.H., and Lee, S.B., Behaviour of plasticity-induced crack closure and roughness-induced crack closure in aluminium alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 2001. 23: p. S247-S251.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00155-4