Energy Assessment for China Nuclear Waste Based on Energy Harvesting

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chinas nuclear waste disposal is Developing country in the world in both technology and management mode, especially the spent fuel final disposal plan is the weaknesses. After a brief overview of the China nuclear waste disposal, the article focuses on analysis nuclear waste management experience. China model characteristics include perfect planning and system, the concept of absolute safety and requirements, and in the whole process of the public participation and dialogue. China model brings us a lot of valuable enlightenment for nuclear waste disposal and management in other country.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

738-741

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Anonymous Sweden to the Atlantic dumped 1, 000 tons of radioactive waste [J]. Foreign nuclear news, 1998 (1): 25 ~ 32.

Google Scholar

[2] That brake. Sweden is how to deal with nuclear waste [J]. Foreign nuclear news, 1991 (3): 23 ~ 24.

Google Scholar

[3] Guo Ruihuang Swedish nuclear waste processing status [J]. Foreign nuclear news, 1999 (5): 27 ~ 28.

Google Scholar

[4] Hüetlin T. neighbors with nuclear waste [J]. Zhang car, compile Southern Weekly, 2011 (23).

Google Scholar

[5] Thegerstrom C. Waste Where to go deep into the ground: the Swedish nuclear waste program [J]. IAEA Bulletin, 2004 (1): 36 ~ 38.

Google Scholar

[6] Anonymous Sweden to strengthen nuclear safety regulations [J]. Foreign nuclear news, 1984 (6): 5.

Google Scholar

[7] Lidskog R, Elander I. Reinterpreting Locational Conflicts: NIMBY and Nuclear Waste Management in Sweden [J]. Policy and Politics, 1992 (4): 249-264.

DOI: 10.1332/030557392782454033

Google Scholar

[8] Earthquake fortification, Wang Feng British nuclear waste management empirical analysis [J]. Environmental Protection, 2012 (17): 69 ~ 71.

Google Scholar