Time-Domain Aeroservoelastic Modeling and Active Flutter Suppression by Model Predictive Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

A time-domain aeroservoelastic model is developed to calculate the flutter speed and an active flutter suppression system is designed by model predictive control. The finite-state, induced-flow theory and equilibrium beam finite element method are chosen to formulate the aeroservoelastic governing equations in state-space form, which is necessary for active flutter suppression design with modern control theory. A sensitivity analysis is performed to find the most appropriate number of induced-flow terms and beam elements. Model predictive control theory is adopted to design an active flutter suppression system due to its ability to deal with the constraints on rate change and amplitude of input. The numerical result shows a satisfactory precision of the flutter speed prediction, the close loop analysis shows that the flutter boundary is considerable expanded.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

688-695

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. H. Hodge, and G. A, Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, Cambridge University, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Haghighat, J. R. R. A. Matrins and H. H.T. Liu, Aeroservoelastic design optimization of a flexible wing. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 49 (2012), 422-443.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Karpel, Design for active flutter suppression and gust alleviation using state-space Aeroelastic modeling, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 19(3) (1982), 221-227.

DOI: 10.2514/3.57379

Google Scholar

[4] H. Ohta, A. Fujimori, P. N. Nikiforuk, M. M. Gupta, Active flutter suppression for two-dimensional airfoils, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 12(2) (1989), 188-194.

DOI: 10.2514/3.20390

Google Scholar

[5] M. R. Waszak, S. Srinathkumar, Flutter suppression for the active flexible wing: a classical design, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 32, (1995), 61-67.

DOI: 10.2514/3.46684

Google Scholar

[6] M. R. Waszak, Modeling the benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model for application to flutter suppression, in: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Confrenece, no. 96-3437, (1996).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-3437

Google Scholar

[7] M. R. Waszak, Robust multivariable flutter suppression for benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 24 (2001), 147-153.

DOI: 10.2514/2.4694

Google Scholar

[8] D. Borglund, J. Kuttenkeuler, Active wing flutter suppression using a trailing edge flap, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol 16 (2002), 271-294.

DOI: 10.1006/jfls.2001.0426

Google Scholar

[9] R. Huang, H. Hu and Y. Zhao, Single-input/single-output adaptive flutter suppression of a three-dimensional aeroelastic system, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 35 (2012), 659-665.

DOI: 10.2514/1.55746

Google Scholar

[10] D.A. Peters, and M.J. Johnson, Finite-state airloads for deformable airfoils on fixed and totating wings, Aeroelasticity and fluid/Structure Interaction, American society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Nov. 1994, 1-28.

Google Scholar

[11] D.A. Peters, and W. Cao, Finite-state induced flow models, Part I: Two-dimensional thin airfoil, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 32 (1995), 313-322.

DOI: 10.2514/3.46718

Google Scholar

[12] D.A. Peters, Two-dimensional incompressible unsteady airfoil theory-An overview, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol 24 (2008), 295-312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.09.001

Google Scholar

[13] J. Przemieniecki, Theory of matrix structural analysis, Dover, New York, (1985).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Hajela, Preliminary weight estimation of conventional and joined wings using equivalent beam models, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 25 (1988), 574-576.

DOI: 10.2514/3.45625

Google Scholar

[15] J. Kuttenkeuler, and U. Ringertz, Aeroelastic design optimization with experimental verification, Journal of Aircraft, Vol 35 (1998), 505-507.

DOI: 10.2514/2.2330

Google Scholar

[16] L. Wang, Model predictive control system design and implementation using MATLAB, Springer, (2009).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Goland, The flutter of a uniform cantilever wing, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol 12 (1945), A197-A208.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4009489

Google Scholar

[18] L. Jensen, and W. I. Kenneth, Aerodynamic lift and moment calculations using a closed-form solution of the possio equation, NASA/TM-2000-209019, Apr (2000).

Google Scholar