The New Design Idea about Rock Direct Tensile Testing Machines Based on the Magnetic Levitation Principle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Direct tensile testing machines are the necessary to study tensile property of rocks. However, a traditional testing machine has the weakness of absenting effective subjacent brace. So, the whole tensile experiment can not be done completely. By using elastic brace, the whole tensile experiment really can be finished, then we can get the stress-strain curve. But, the samples are destroyed around incorrect planes. Aiming at the disadvantage of the machines, the author brings forward a new method of improving the direct tensile testing machine by using two magnets as the subjacent brace with magnetic levitation function. In this article, the author analyses the reasons why magnetic levitation can offer support and explains the components of the brace, its installation and principles. At last, the authors analyze the design idea and the technical effect of the brace.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

148-153

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gunnar W (1978) Some new theoretical aspects of indirect measurements of the tensile strength of rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 15(4): 149-160.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(78)91221-4

Google Scholar

[2] Wang QZ, Wu L-Z (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] ISRM(1978). Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 15(1): 99-103.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7

Google Scholar

[4] ASTM (1987). Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM C496-86).

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang SH, Miao X-X, Zhao H-Y (1999). Influence of test methods on measured results of rock tensile strength. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology 28(3): 243-246.

Google Scholar

[6] Dou QF, Yue S, Dai G-F (2004). Experimental study on direct and indirect tension of rock. Underground Space 24(2): 178-181.

Google Scholar

[7] Tao JN(1995). Comparative analysis of test results by axial tension method splitting method. Metal Mine (3): 28-31.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Hillerborg: Mater. Stru. Vol. 18 (1985), pp.291-296.

Google Scholar

[9] Lin WR, Takahashi M (2008). Anisotropy of strength and deformation of Inada granite under uniaxial tension. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 27(12): 2463-2472.

Google Scholar

[10] Okubo S, Fukui K, Qi Q X (2006). Uniaxial compression and tension tests of anthracite and loading rate dependence of peak strength. International Journal of Coal Geology 68(3-4): 196-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2006.02.004

Google Scholar

[11] Liao JJ, Yang M T, Hsieh H Y (1991). Direct tensile behavior of a transversely isotropic rock. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 34(5): 831-849.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(96)00065-4

Google Scholar

[12] Spring supported lower clamper for direct tensile test (patent of invention) (2007). 200610022224. 8, China.

Google Scholar

[13] Zhao Zh (2011). A New Direct Tension Machine and its Application. Advanced Materials Research 250-2531: 1448-1451.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.250-253.1448

Google Scholar

[14] Zhao Zh (2007). The Deformation and Failure Research for Rocks Based on the Principle of Energy Dissipation and Energy Release (doctoral dissertation). Sichuan University, China.

Google Scholar