The Inter-Datacenter Connection in SDN and Traditional Hybrid Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the extensive application and continuous growth of big data, new challenges are imposed into network design. Without enough consideration of big data in traditional design, bottleneck problems will occur frequently in such IT infrastructure. SDN (Software Defined Network) is one of the solutions to conquer such problems. However, most current SDN applications are limited to pure SDN structure or internal data centers. Differently, we focus on the traffic transmission between data centers in this paper. We construct the WAN links between data centers through VPN based on SDN architecture and traditional network. Both theoretical analysis and experiment results show that SDN had advantage over traditional network. Our work also suggested SDN architecture and traditional network could coexist in the real condition.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 915-916)

Pages:

1418-1423

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yoo, S.J. Ben, in 2012 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, p.1, Nov, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] ONF White Paper, Software-Defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks.

Google Scholar

[3] ONF on https: /www. opennetworking. org/en/sdn-resources/sdn-definition.

Google Scholar

[4] Internet2 on http: /www. networkworld. com/news/2012/070912-internet2-260703. html.

Google Scholar

[5] SDN in Deutsche Telekom on http: /sdnworldevent. com/alex-clauberg-deutsche-telekom.

Google Scholar

[6] Google's OpenFlow backbone on http: /www. networkworld. com/news/2012/060712-google- openflow-vahdat-259965. html.

Google Scholar

[7] N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar,L. Peterson, J. Rexford,S. Shenker, and J. Turner, SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), p.69–74, (2008).

DOI: 10.1145/1355734.1355746

Google Scholar

[8] Sharma, Puneet, S. Banerjee, S. Tandel, R. Aguiar, R. Amorim, and D. Pinheiro, 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, pp.688-691, (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] S. Abhinava, S. Syed, P. Pan, C. Liou, I. Monga, C. Guok and A. Lake, IEEE 21st Annual Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects, pp.87-90, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/hoti.2013.20

Google Scholar

[10] L. Velasco, A. Asensio, J. Berral, A. Castro and V. López, Optics Express, 22(1), pp.55-61, (2014).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, H. Yang, and X. Yu, CHINACOM 2013, pp.771-775, (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] L. Dan, A. Wundsam, B. Heller, N. Handiol, and A. Feldmann, The first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks, ACM, p.1–6, (2012).

DOI: 10.1145/2342441.2342443

Google Scholar

[13] R. Mark, N. Foster, J. Recford, and D. Walker, The 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, ACM, p.7: 1–7: 6, (2011).

Google Scholar

[14] H.E. Egilmez, S.T. Dane, K.T. Bagci, and A.M. Tekalp, OpenQoS: An OpenFlow controller design for multimedia delivery with end-to-end Quality of Service over Software-Defined Networks, in: APSIPA 2012, Hollywood, USA , Dec. (2012).

Google Scholar