Tempering of Direct Quenched Low-Alloy Ultra-High-Strength Steel, Part I – Microstructure

Article Preview

Abstract:

The direct quenching of low-carbon steel has been shown to be an effective way of producing ultra-high-strength, tough structural steels in the as-quenched state without tempering. However, in the present study, the influence of tempering at 500 °C has been studied in order to evaluate the possibilities of widening the range of strengths that can be produced from a single base composition. The chosen composition was 0.1C-0.2Si-1.1Mn-0.15Mo-0.03Ti-0.002B. In order to compare direct quenching with conventional quenching, two pre-quench austenite states were studied: a thermomechanically rolled, non-recrystallized, pancaked austenite grain structure and a recrystallized, equiaxed grain structure. Quenched and quenched-and-tempered microstructures were studied using FESEM and FESEM-EBSD. The as-quenched microstructures of the reheated and quenched and direct quenched specimens were fully martensitic and martensitic-bainitic, respectively. In both cases, tempering made the needle-shaped auto-tempered carbides of the as-quenched materials more spherical. In the case of the direct quenched (DQ) material, tempering led to a notable increase in the size of the grain boundary carbides. Prior austenite grain size and effective grain size after quenching were larger in the case of reheated and quenched material (RQ). Tempering had no effect on effective grain size. The crystallographic texture of the DQ material showed strong {112}<131> and {554}<225> components. The RQ material also contained the same components, but it also contained an intense {110}<110> and {011}<100> components. The effects of these microstructural changes on tensile, impact toughness and fracture toughness are described in part II.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

316-321

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[2] M. Hemmilä, R. Laitinen, T. Liimatainen, D. Porter, Mechanical and technological properties of ultra high strength OPTIM steel, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Super-High Strength Steels, Rome, Italy, AIM, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] A.J. Kaijalainen, P.P. Suikkanen, L.P. Karjalainen, J.I. Kömi, A.J. DeArdo, Effect of austenite conditioning in the non-recrystallization regime on the microstructures and properties of ultra high strength bainitic/martensitic strip steel, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Super-High Strength Steels, Peschiera del Garda, Italy, AIM, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203336

Google Scholar

[4] A.J. Kaijalainen, P.P. Suikkanen, T.J. Limnell, L.P. Karjalainen, J.I. Kömi, D.A. Porter, Effect of austenite grain structure on the strength and toughness of direct-quenched martensite, J. Alloys Compounds, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.03.030

Google Scholar

[5] V. Kesti, A. Kaijalainen, A. Väisänen, A. Järvenpää, A. Määttä, A-M. Arola, K. Mäntyjärvi, R. Ruoppa, Bendability and microstructure of direct quenched Optim® 960QC, submitted to Thermec'2013 proceedings.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.783-786.818

Google Scholar

[6] S. Morito, Y. Hoshida, T. Maki, X. Huang, Effect of block size on the strength of lath martensite in low carbon steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 438-440 (2006) 237-240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.048

Google Scholar

[7] N.C. Muckelroy, K.O. Finley R.L. Bodnar, Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct quenched versus conventional reaustenitized and quenched plate, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22 (2013) 512-522.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-012-0251-y

Google Scholar

[8] X. Sun, Z. Li, Q. Yong, Z. Yang, H. Dong, Y. Weng, Third generation high strength low alloy steels with improved toughness, Sci. China Tech. Sci. 55 (2012) 1797-1805.

DOI: 10.1007/s11431-012-4876-8

Google Scholar

[9] S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, The morphology and crystallography of lath martensite in Fe-C alloys, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 1789-1799.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00577-3

Google Scholar

[10] M. Hayakawa, S. Matsuoka, K. Tsuzaki, Microstructural analyses of grain boundary carbides of tempered martensite in medium-carbon steel by atomic force microscopy, Mater. Trans. 43 (2002) 1758-1766.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.43.1758

Google Scholar

[11] S. Kotrechko, Y. Meshkov, R. Televich, Effect of the size of martensite laths and carbide particles on the brittle, strength of low-carbon martensitic steels, Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 48 (2006) 405-411.

DOI: 10.1007/s11041-006-0107-x

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ahn, D. Kim, W. Nam, Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of low alloy steel tempered by induction heating, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 160 (2005) 54-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.019

Google Scholar

[13] S. Pallaspuro, A. Kaijalainen, T. Limnell, D. Porter, Tempering of direct quenched low-alloy ultra-high-strength steel, Part II - Mechanical Properties, submitted to Thermec'2013 proceedings.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.922.580

Google Scholar

[4] R.L. Higginson, C.M. Sellars, Worked Examples in Quantitative Metallography, Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, London, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Zajac, V. Schwinn, K-H. Tacke, Characterization and quantification of complex bainitic microstructures in high and ultra-high strength linepipe steels, Mater. Sci. Forum 500-501 (2005) 387-394.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.500-501.387

Google Scholar