Paper Titles

Preface, Conference Organization and Acknowledgement

Thermal Oxidation Mechanism of CuO Nanowires and Layered Copper Oxides Structure
p.3

Characterization of Organic Matter Released during Analytical Pyrolysis of PM₁₀ Samples Obtained from Biomass and Oil Combustion
p.7

Structure Analysis and Fabrication of Binary Colloid Crystals
p.13

Optimal Number of Contact Angle Measurements on Pyrite Surface
p.17

Characterization of Mg_xZn_1-xO Films Grown by Electrochemical Deposition
p.22

A Fuzzy Recognition of early Crack of Metal Deep Drawing Stamping Based on the Fuzzy Clustering
p.26

A Novel Zeolite-Containing Composite Material Synthesized via In Situ Crystallization
p.32

Advances in High-Purity Alumina and Resource Distribution
p.36

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 926-930Optimal Number of Contact Angle Measurements on...

Optimal Number of Contact Angle Measurements on Pyrite Surface

Article Preview

Abstract:

Contact angle measurement is a simple and quick method that expresses the surface wettability. Resulting values vary and depend on many factors that significantly affect the interpretation of results. In this paper a set of seventeen samples from different deposits with different genesis were subjected to a statistical evaluation, to determine the optimal number of measurements needed to obtain the desired standard deviation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Progress in Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 926-930)

Pages:

17-21

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.926-930.17

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2014

Authors:

Lukas Koval*, Jarmila Drozdova

Keywords:

Contact Angle, Number of Measurements, Pyrite, Standard Deviation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Klein, B., Dutrow, J.D. Dana, Manual of mineral science: (after James D. Dana). 23rd ed., J. Wiley, Hoboken N.J., (2008).

[2] M. He, W. Qin, W. Li, K. Zeng, Pyrite depression in marmatite flotation by sodium glycerine-xanthate, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 21/5 (2011) 1161-1165.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(11)60837-6

[3] T.T. Chau, A review of techniques for measurement of contact angles and their applicability on mineral surfaces, J. Mineng. 22 (2009) 213-219.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.07.009

[4] L.P. Ding, Investigation of Bituminous Coal Hydrophobicity and its Influence on Flotation, Energy 23/11 (2009) 5536-5543.

DOI: 10.1021/ef900589d

[5] T.T. Chau, W.J. Bruckard, P.T.L. Koh, A.V. Nguyen, A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice, J. Cis. 150/2 (2009) 106-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.003

[6] P. Ofori, B. Firth, G. O'Brien, C. Mcnally, A.V. Nguyen, Assessing the Hydrophobicity of Petrographically Heterogeneous Coal Surfaces, Energy 24/11 (2010) 5965-5971.

DOI: 10.1021/ef100793t

[7] S. Muganda, M. Zanin, S.R. Grano, Benchmarking the flotation performance of ores, Minerals Engineering 26/3-4 (2012) 70-79.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.11.002

[8] N. Shojai Kaveh, E. Susanne, J. Rudolph, A.A. Wolf, S.N. Ashrafizadeh, Wettability determination by contact angle measurements: hvbB coal–water system with injection of synthetic flue gas and CO2, J. Jcis. 364/1 (2011) 237-247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.091

[9] T. Matsumura, F. Iida, T. Hirose, M. Yoshino, Micro machining for control of wettability with surface topografy, J. Jmatprotec. 212/12 (2012) 2669-2677.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.021

[10] K.J. Kubiak, M.C.T. Wilson, T.G. Mathia, P. Carval, Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces, J. Wear 271/3-4 (2011) 523-528.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.029

[11] A. Gosiewska, J. Drelich, J.S. Briscoe, M. Pawlik, Mineral Matter Distribution on Coal Surface and Its Effect on Coal Wettability, J. Jcis. 247/1 (2002) 107-116.

DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8130

[12] J. Bachmann, A Ellies, K. H Hartge, Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency, J. Hydro. 231-232 (2000) 66-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00184-0

[13] J. Drelich, J.S. Laskowsky, M. Pawuk, Improved Sample Preparation and Surface Analysis Methodology for Contact Angle Measurements on Coal ( Heterogeneous) Surfaces, Coal Prep. 21/3 (2000) 247-275.

DOI: 10.1080/07349340008945621

[14] M. Meloun, J. Militky, Statistical Data Anaylsis A Practical Guide, 1 ed., Woodhead Pub Ltd., (2011).

[15] A.M. Raichur, X. H Wang, B. K Parekh, Quantifying pyrite surface oxidation kinetics by contact angle measurements, Col. Surf. 167/3 (2000) 245-251.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(99)00512-9