CFD in Continuous Stirred Tank: Comparison between Rushton and Paddle Turbines

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biogas produced from palm oil mill effluent (POME) is common in Thailand. A 2-step digestion system, which consists of a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) and a UASB, is being implemented for biohythane (biohydrogen and biomethane) production. This paper describes three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of POME flow in a laboratory-scale CSTR. The study focuses on comparisonof impellers, the Rushton and the paddle turbines, for the best POME mixing with minimum loss of granules. The result of flow patterns in CFD showed that better mixing in the bottom through the middle of the tank can be achieved by proper selection of impellers and baffles to avoid the loss of granules by effluent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)

Pages:

1139-1143

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sompong O-Thong, Poonsuk Prasertsan, Nils-Kare Birkeland, Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis, Bioresource Technology 100 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.036

Google Scholar

[2] Sompong O-Thong, Poonsuk Prasertsan, Nugul Intrasungkha, Srisuda Dhamwichukorn, Nils-Kare Birkeland, Improvement of biohydrogen production and treatment efficiency on palm oil mill effluent with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor, Enzyme and Microbial Technology 41 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.05.002

Google Scholar

[3] Jie Ding, Xu Wang, Xue-Fei Zhou, Nan-Qi Ren, Wan-Qian Guo, CFD optimization of continuous stirred-tank (CSTR) reactor for biohydrogen production, Bioresource Technology 101 (2010) 7005–7013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.146

Google Scholar

[4] M.H. Vakili, M. Nasr Esfahany, CFD analysis of turbulence in baffle stirred tank, a three-compartment model, Chemical Engineering Science. 64 (2009) 351-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.037

Google Scholar

[5] A. Egedy, T. Varga, T. Choran, Investigation on Hydrodynamic in Stirred Vessels for Education Purpose, The Comsol Conference, Stuttgart(2011).

Google Scholar

[6] A. KayodeCoker, Modeling of Chemical Kinetics and Reactor Design, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, (2001).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Prasertsana, B. Sajjakulnukit, Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportunity and barriers, Renewable Energy 31 (2006) 599–610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.08.005

Google Scholar

[8] C. Cavinato, D. Bolzonella, F. Fatone, F. Cecchi, P. Pavan, Optimization of two-phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biowaste for hydrogen and methane production through reject water recirculation, Bioresource Technology 102 (2011) 8605–8611.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.084

Google Scholar

[9] Dong-Hoon Kim, Sang-Hyoun Kim, Ku-Yong Kim, Hang-Sik Shin, Experience of a pilot-scale hydrogen-producing anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) treating food waste, Hydrogen Energy. 35 (2010) 1590 – 1594.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.041

Google Scholar

[10] Sompong O-Thong, Poonsuk Prasertsan, Dimitar Karakashev, Irini Angelidaki, Thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacteriumthermosaccharolyticum PSU-2, Hydrogen Energy. 33 (2008) 1204 – 1214.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.015

Google Scholar