A Method of Recommendation the Most Used XML Tags

Abstract:

Processing of a large data set which is known for today as big data processing is still a problem that has not yet a well-defined solution. The data can be both structured and unstructured. For the structured part, eXtensible Markup Language (XML) is a major tool that freely allows document owners to describe and organize their data using their markup tags. One major problem, however, behind this freedom lies in the big data retrieving process. The same or similar information that are described using the different tags or different structures may not be retrieved if the query statements contains different keywords to the one used in the markup tags. The best way to solve this problem is to specify a standard set of the markup tags for each problem domain. The creation of such a standard set if done manually requires a lot of hard work and is a time consuming process. In addition, it may be hard to define terms that are acceptable by all people. This research proposes a model for a new technique, XML Tag Recommendation (XTR) that aims to solve this problem. This technique applies the idea of Case Base Reasoning (CBR) by collecting the most used tags in each domain as a case. These tags come from the collection of related words in WordNet. The WordCount that is the web site to find the frequency of words is applied to choose the most used one. The input (problem) to the XTR system is an XML document contains the tags specified by the document owners. The solution is a set of the recommended tags, which is the most used tags, for the problem domain of the document. Document owners have a freedom to change or not change the tags in their documents and can provide feedback to the XTR system.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)
• Pages: 1353-1359
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.1353
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Sutheetutt Vacharaskunee*, Sarun Intakosum
• Keywords: PathMatch, WordCount, Wordnet, XML, XML Tag Matching, XML Tag Recommendation

References

[1] Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1. 0 on http: /www. w3. org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210 [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[2] S. Vacharaskunee, S. Intakosum, An Approach to XML Tag Recommendation, the 8th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, Las Vegas, 2011, pp.18-23.

DOI: 10.1109/itng.2011.11

[3] WordNet http: /wordnet. princeton. edu [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[4] WordCount on http: /www. wordcount. org [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[5] Namespaces in XML on http: /www. w3. org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/ [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[6] XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1. 0 on http: /www. w3. org/TR/xslt [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[7] W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1. 1 on http: /www. w3. org/TR/xmlschema11-1 [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[8] Document Type Definition on http: /www. w3. org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd. html [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

[9] J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, E. Rahm, Generic Schema Matching with Cupid, the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Roma, 2001, pp.49-58.

[10] H. Do, E. Rahm, COMA: a System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches, the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Hong Kong, 2002, pp.610-621.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-155860869-6/50060-3

[11] D. Aumueller, H. Do, S. Massmann, E. Rahm, Schema and Ontology Matching with COMA++, the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Baltimore, 2005, pp.906-908.

DOI: 10.1145/1066157.1066283

[12] P. Bernstein, S. Melnik, J. Churchill, Incremental Schema Matching, the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Seoul, 2006, pp.1167-1170.

[13] S. Vacharaskunee, S. Intakosum, XML Element Recommendation by Semantic Ranking, the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, Singapore, 2010, pp.244-248.

DOI: 10.1109/iccae.2010.5451204

[14] S. Vacharaskunee, S. Intakosum, XML Document Recommendation by Using Case-based Reasoning, the 11th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, London, 2010, pp.121-126.

DOI: 10.1109/snpd.2010.29

[15] S. Vacharaskunee, S. Intakosum, XML path matching for different hierarchy order of elements in XML documents. the 11th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, London, 2010, pp.82-86.

DOI: 10.1109/snpd.2010.22

[16] MetaQuerier: Exploring and Integrating the Deep Web on http: /metaquerier. cs. uiuc. edu [Access: January 29, 2014].

[17] UW XML Repository on http: /www. cs. washington. edu/research/xmldatasets [Access: January 29, 2014].

[18] I. Song, J. Paik, U. Kim, Semantic-based Similarity Computation for XML Document, 2007 International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Korean Bible University, Seoul, 2007, pp.796-803.

DOI: 10.1109/mue.2007.188