Environmental Risk Assessment of Mn, Cu and Fe in the Lam Takhong Reservoir, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recently, usage of the metal-based pesticide especially manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) have been widely used in the agricultural area around the Lam Takhong Reservoir; the major water resource of Nakhon Ratchasima Province and the Southern I-Sarn. The exposures of these metals can causes neurological and Parkinson diseases. Therefore the objectives of this study were to investigate Mn, Cu, and Fe contaminations in the reservoir as well as the environmental risks by using hazard quotient (HQ). The results showed that the average concentrations of Mn, Cu, and Fe in water column were 0.05 mg/l, 0.01 mg/l, 0.39 mg/l in dry season and 0.08 mg/l, 0.01 mg/l, 0.53 mg/l in wet season, respectively. Mn and Cu concentrations were in normal range except those of Fe that were extremely high. Also, Mn and Cu in sediment were found in the normal range. Interestingly, high concentrations of Fe in sediment were found at many stations with respect of the parent materials in this area. Fortunately, there were no risks of Mn and Cu in both water column and sediment. However, Fe in sediment exceeded the recommended guideline. These results suggested that using Mn/Cu-based synthetic pesticides in this area might be limited with respect of Fe abundance that could enhanced the toxicity of Mn/Cu and might increased the incidents of neurological and Parkinson diseases.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)

Pages:

727-732

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Department of agriculture, Annually report of Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] Alloway, B. J. Heavy metals in soils, London: Blackie Academic and Professional. (1995).

Google Scholar

[3] Maria, R. P, Hamid El Bilali, Vito Simeone, Nuray Baser, Copper contents in grapes and wines from a Mediterranean organic vineyard. Elsevier, Food Chemistry. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.103

Google Scholar

[4] P.D. Howe, H.M. Malcolm and Dr S. Dobson, Manganese and its compounds environment aspects, Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 63, United Kingdom. (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Saktong, Distribution of Manganese and Copper in GAPs vineyard and its potential environmental risk. A case study at vineyard in Pakchong District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Master of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok. (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] Regional environmental office region 11, Water quality report in Nakhon Ratchasima. (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] Poranee Pataranawat, Preeda Parkpian, Mercury emission and distribution: Potential environmental risks at small scale gold mining, Journal of environmental of science. (2007).

DOI: 10.1080/10934520701418573

Google Scholar

[8] APHA, AWWA, Standard method for the Examination of Water and Waste water. 20th Washington DC; American Public Health Association, (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] Walkley, A. and Black, C. A, Chromic acid titration method of determination of soil organic matter. Soil Science, 63. (1947) 257.

Google Scholar

[10] Chapman, H. D, Cation exchange capacity. In method of soil analysis. Part2 Chemical and Microbiological properties, American Society of Agronomy, Inc USA. (1965).

Google Scholar

[11] National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST), Chemical composition Standard Reference Materials (SRMs)1646a , Estuarine Sediment. (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund and Screening-level Exposure Estimate and Risk Calculation. (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] Mandouh S. Masoud, Distribution of some metal concentration in water and sediment of Lake Edku Egypt. Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia. (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] Bodek, Ecological Soil Screening Level for Iron Interim Final. (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] Evans, L.J. Chemistry of metal retention by soils: Several processes are explained. Environmental Science & Technology. (1989) 1048–1056.

Google Scholar

[16] Jun Peng, Fang Feng Stevenson and May Lin O, Iron-enhanced paraquat-mediated dopaminergic cell death due to increased oxidative stress as a consequence of microglial activation. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.045

Google Scholar

[17] Habes Ghrefat, Nigem Yusuf, Assessing Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Cd pollution in bottom sediments of Wadi Al-Arab Dam, Jordan, Chemosphere 65. (2006) 2114–2121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.043

Google Scholar

[18] Geering, H.R., Hodgson, Micronutrient cation complexes in soil solution: IV. The chemical state of manganese in soil solution. Soil Sci Soc Amer Proc, 33(1969) 81-85.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300010023x

Google Scholar

[19] Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.B. Minerals in Soil Environments, 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America. (1989).

Google Scholar

[20] Information on http: /www. giswebldd. ldd. go. th.

Google Scholar

[21] Indika B Gawarammana, Nicholas A Buckley, Medical management of paraquat ingestion, South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration. (2011).

Google Scholar