Management of the Schmutzdecke Layer in a Slow Sand Filter to Reuse Drainage Water from a Greenhouse

Abstract:

Recycling of the nutrient solution used to irrigate fruit and vegetables in greenhouses can increase water use efficiency and reduce the contamination of local water sources. The nutrient solution cannot be recycled without treatment because of potential contamination of the entire plant system with bacteria, viruses, and/or fungi. Ozonation, pasteurization and chemigation are the typical techniques used, but are often expensive and not always effective [. Slow sand filter (SSF) is a technology that is relatively inexpensive to purchase and operate. Data was collected from two SSF to verify treatment efficacy and associated hydraulic characteristics. The SSF was able to consistently produce water with a turbidity less than 1 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) and with the infiltration capacity to treat 0.27 m³ m^-2 h^-1 of greenhouse effluent; which, equates to treating 3,600 L d^-1 of drainage water from a 1,000 m² greenhouse. The recovery rate for the filter was an average of 110 minutes. Ideal growing conditions for bacteria responsible for the treatment of the water in the SSF included warm and consistent water temperature, high nutrient content, and organic loading in the water. The SSF was able to sustain the hydraulic loading rate of 0.27 m³ m^-2 h^-1 for 16 days. At the end of this period the organic layer that was present at the sand/water interface reduced the infiltration rate because of the formation of the Schmutzdecke layer (SL). An air/water jet cleaning system scoured the SL and suspended it so that it could be drained.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)
• Pages: 834-838
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.834
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Peter Livingston, Donald Slack
• Keywords: Greenhouse, Schmutzdecke Layer, Slow Sand Filter

References

[1] Calvo-Bado, L.A., Pettitt, T.R., Parsons, N., Petch, G.M., Morgan, A. W., and Whipps, J.M. 2003. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Microbial Community in Slow Sand Filters Used for Treating Horticultural Irrigation Water. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(4), 2116-2125.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.4.2116-2125.2003

[2] Smith, G. 2007. Field Vs Glasshouse Tomatoes. Practical Hydroponics and Greenhouses 94. Available at: http: /hydroponics. com. au/issue-94-field-vs-glasshouse-tomatoes.

[3] Hanson, B.R. and May, D.M. 2006. Crop Evapotranspiration of Processing Tomato in the San Joaquin Valley of California, USA. Irrigation Science, 24 (2006), pp.211-221.

DOI: 10.1007/s00271-005-0020-x

[4] Sabeh, Nadia C., Giacomelli, Gene A., Kubota, Chieri. 2007. Water Us by Greenhouse Evaporative Cooling Systems in a Semi-Arid Climate. ASABE Paper 074013.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.23054

[5] Moody, C. 2002. Pilot Investigation of Slowsand Filtration and Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Central Arizona Project Water. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Advanced Water Treatment Report No. 90. Available at: http: /www. usbr. gov/research/AWT/reportpdfs/report090. pdf.