Detoxification Capabilities of Adsorbents for Artificial Liver Support Devices: A Comparison

Article Preview

Abstract:

Adsorption performances of activated carbon Norit RO 0.8, neutral resin Amberlite XAD-7, anion resin Dowex 1x4 and cation resin Dowex 50wx4 were investigated in detail for artificial liver support devices. Firstly, equilibrium adsorption experiments of these adsorbents to albumin, creatinine, bilirubin, tryptophan and cholic acid were conducted respectively. Then their adsorption capacities were obtained by curve fitting. The results indicate that activated carbon Norit RO 0.8 and anion resin Dowex 1x4 are two better adsorbents for removing toxins. Lastly, adsorption rate constants of activated carbon Norit RO 0.8 and anion resin Dowex 1x4 to all above solutes were studied with pseudo-first and second-order kinetic adsorption models. The results show that the toxin adsorption rate of anion resin Dowex 1x4 is faster than that of activated carbon Norit RO 0.8. The systematical experimental results in this paper are very important references for researchers in the field of blood purification based on adsorption technology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

789-794

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Carpentier, A. Gautier, and C. Legallais, Artificial and bioartificial liver devices: present and future, Gut, vol. 58, pp.1690-1702, (2009).

DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.175380

Google Scholar

[2] B. Carpentier and S. R. Ash, Sorbent-based artificial liver devices: principles of operation, chemical effects and clinical results, Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 4, pp.839-861, (2007).

DOI: 10.1586/17434440.4.6.839

Google Scholar

[3] S. R. Ash, Extracorporeal blood detoxification by sorbents in treatment of hepatic encephalopathy, Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy, vol. 9, pp.3-18, (2002).

DOI: 10.1053/jarr.2002.30474

Google Scholar

[4] S. R. Ash, T. A. Sullivan, and D. J. Carr, Sorbent suspensions vs. sorbent columns for extracorporeal detoxification in hepatic failure, Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 10, pp.145-153, (2006).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00356.x

Google Scholar

[5] V. V. Sarnatskaya, W. E. Lindup, P. Walther, V. N. Maslenny, L. A. Yushko, A. S. Sidorenko, A. V. Nikolaev, and V. G. Nikolaev, Albumin, bilirubin, and activated carbon: New edges of an old triangle, Artificial Cells Blood Substitutes and Immobilization Biotechnology, vol. 30, pp.113-126, (2002).

DOI: 10.1081/bio-120003192

Google Scholar

[6] S. R. Ash, D. J. Carr, and T. A. Sullivan, Sorbent suspension reactor for extracorporeal detoxification in hepatic failure or drug overdose, Asaio Journal, vol. 50, pp. Lviii-Lxv, (2004).

DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000147959.42358.0b

Google Scholar

[7] K. Rifai, T. Ernst, U. Kretschmer, M. J. Bahr, A. Schneider, C. Hafer, H. Haller, M. P. Manns, and D. Fliser, Prometheus (R) - a new extracorporeal system for the treatment of liver failure, Journal of Hepatology, vol. 39, pp.984-990, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00468-9

Google Scholar

[8] F. Wong, Drug Insight: the role of albumin in the management of chronic liver disease, Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 4, pp.43-51, (2007).

DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0680

Google Scholar

[9] P. Krisper and R. E. Stauber, Technology Insight: artificial extracorporeal liver support - how does Prometheus (R) compare with MARS (R)?, Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, vol. 3, pp.267-276, (2007).

DOI: 10.1038/ncpneph0466

Google Scholar

[10] J. L. Irvin, C. G. Johnston, and J. Kopala, A photometric method for the determination of cholates in bile and blood, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 153, pp.439-457, (1944).

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71986-8

Google Scholar

[11] M. C. Annesini, C. Di Carlo, V. Piemonte, and L. Turchetti, Bilirubin and tryptophan adsorption in albumin-containing solutions. I. Equilibrium isotherms on activated carbon, Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 40, pp.205-210, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.12.010

Google Scholar

[12] V. G. Nikolaev, V. V. Sarnatskaya, V. L. Sigal, V. N. Klevtsov, K. E. Makhorin, and L. A. Yushko, High-porosity activated carbons for bilirubin removal, International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 14, pp.179-185, (1991).

DOI: 10.1177/039139889101400311

Google Scholar

[13] A. Ebadi, J. S. S. Mohammadzadeh, and A. Khudiev, What is the correct form of BET isotherm for modeling liquid phase adsorption?, Adsorption-Journal of the International Adsorption Society, vol. 15, pp.65-73, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10450-009-9151-3

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Onal, C. Akmil-Basar, D. Eren, C. Sarici-Ozdemir, and T. Depci, Adsorption kinetics of malachite green onto activated carbon prepared from Tuncbilek lignite, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 128, pp.150-157, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.055

Google Scholar

[15] Y. S. Ho and G. McKay, Sorption of dye from aqueous solution by peat, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 70, pp.115-124, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0923-0467(98)00076-1

Google Scholar