The Evaluation in Fuzzy Matter-Element Theory Based on Hybrid Weight

Abstract:

Because the personnel quality evaluation at home and abroad is mostly too subjective, it could not satisfy the requirement for the objective and effective evaluation, the fuzzy matter-element evaluation theory and realization based on the hybrid weight is proposed in this paper. The objective weight and subjective weight is Respectively proposed using the entropy method and the analytic hierarchy process, and the hybrid weight is formed by the objective weight and subjective weight using the weight coefficient,thus the model of fuzzy matter-element evaluation theory based on hybrid weight is constructed. This method Overcomes the drawback that the evaluation index weight is too subjective, solving the problem that the qualitative indicators in the evaluation process is difficult to accurately measure and describe, the combination of subjective and objective factors affect improves the accuracy of the evaluation. The experimental results show that, the evaluation accuracy of the method for railway maintainer is more than 90% , this method effectively improves the detection accuracy compared to other methods. It provides the managers with a set of effective evaluation system and method.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 937)
• Pages: 679-685
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.937.679
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Dong Yao Jia, Sheng Xiong Zou*
• Keywords: Evaluation Model, Fuzzy Matter-Element, Hybrid Weight

References

[1] B.D. Rouyendegh, T.E. Erkan, Selection of academic staff using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy orocess(FAHP): a pilot study[J]. Tehnicki vjesnik-technical gazette, 2012, Vol. 19: 4.

[2] A.C. Clark , A. Y . Scales, A Delphi Study of Assessment Practices in Engineering Education) WN All fields [J]. Engineering Design Graphics Journal. 2003, 67(2): 21-32.

[3] Y.J. Huang, C.L. Dong, S.C. Li, The enterprise personnel quality evaluation model of research based on BP neural network [J]. Modern management science, 2008, 5: 38. (In Chinese).

[4] F. Darema, Grid computing and beyond: the context of dynamic data driven applications systems [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2005, 93(3): 692 - 697.

DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2004.842783

[5] T.R. Damarla, T. Pham, D. Lake, An algorithm for classifying multiple targets using acoustic signature[C]. In Proceedings of SPIE Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion and Target Recognition, 2004, Vol. 5429: 421- 427.

DOI: 10.1117/12.544523

[6] Y.T. Chen G.H. Chen M.J. Li, Classification and research advancement of comprehensive evaluation methods [J]. Journal of management science, 2004, 7(2): 69-79. (In Chinese).

[7] Z.S. Xu, Q.L. Da, An overview of operators for aggregating information[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18( 9): 953-969.

[8] T.K. Sung, N. Chang, G. Lee, Dynamics of modeling in data mining Interpretive approach to bankruptcy prediction[ J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1999, 16( 1): 63-85.

DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518234