Research and Implementation of Safety Verification of Polynomial Hybrid Systems Based on Symbolic-Numeric Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

As a mathematical model for cyber-physical system, hybrid systems are dynamical systems that are governed by interacting discrete and continuous dynamics. In this paper, we present a symbolic-numeric hybrid method to generate inequality inductive invariants for safety verification of polynomial hybrid systems, and based on this method, we develop an automated verification tool HSProver.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

485-490

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.A. Henzinger. The theory of hybrid automata[C]. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 278–292. IEEE Computer Society, (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/lics.1996.561342

Google Scholar

[2] Edward A Lee. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges[C]. In 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), pages 363–369. IEEE, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/isorc.2008.25

Google Scholar

[3] Glenford J Myers, Corey Sandler, and Tom Badgett. The art of software testing[M]. John Wiley & Sons, (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/stvr.322

Google Scholar

[4] Doron Peled. Software reliability methods[M]. Springer, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] Thomas A Henzinger, Pei-Hsin Ho, and Howard Wong-Toi. HyTech: A model checker for hybrid systems[C]. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pages 460–463. Springer, (1997).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63166-6_48

Google Scholar

[6] Goran Frehse. PHAVer: Algorithmic verification of hybrid systems past HyTech[C]. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC '05, pages 258–273. Springer, (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31954-2_17

Google Scholar

[7] Goran Frehse, Colas Le Guernic, Alexandre Donze, Scott Cotton, Rajarshi Ray, Olivier Lebeltel, Rodolfo Ripado, Antoine Girard, Thao Dang, and Oded Maler. SpaceEx: Scalable verification of hybrid systems[C]. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pages 379–395. Springer, (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_30

Google Scholar

[8] Eugene Asarin, Thao Dang, and Oded Maler. The d/dt tool for verification of hybrid systems[C]. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pages 365–370. Springer, (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45657-0_30

Google Scholar

[9] Johan Bengtsson, Kim Larsen, Fredrik Larsson, Paul Pettersson, and Wang Yi. Uppaal-a tool suite for automatic verification of real-time systems[J]. Hybrid Systems III, pages 232–243, (1996).

DOI: 10.1007/bfb0020949

Google Scholar

[10] Andre Platzer and Jan-David Quesel. KeYmaera: A hybrid theorem prover for hybrid systems (system description) [C]. In Automated Reasoning, pages 171–178. Springer, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_15

Google Scholar

[11] Wang Lin, Min Wu, Zhengfeng Yang, and Zhenbing Zeng. Exact safety verification of hybrid systems using sums-of-squares representation[J]. CIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, 56, doi: 10. 1007/s11432-013-4961-z. (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11432-013-4961-z

Google Scholar

[12] Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Henny Sipma, and Zohar Manna. Constructing invariants for hybrid systems[J]. Formal Methods in System Design, 32: 25–55, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s10703-007-0046-1

Google Scholar