The Influence of Friction Coefficient on Tenon/Groove Contact Performance in Nickel-Based Turbine Blade-Disc

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presented the influence of crystallographic orientation and friction coefficient on the contact stress and fatigue life in the tenon/groove contact region. A rate-dependent crystallographic plastic slip theory was used to calculate the contact stress and fatigue life in [001], [011] and [111] orientations. In the calculation, complex loading conditions and different friction coefficients of 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 were taken into account in tenon/groove. Then the relationship between contact stress, fatigue life and friction coefficient was discussed. Simulation results show that: friction coefficient and crystallographic orientation have significant effect on contact stress and fatigue life. Contact stress in [001], [011] and [111] orientation increases with increasing friction coefficient generally. For [001] and [011] orientation, the fatigue life decreases with increasing friction coefficient firstly. When friction coefficient is 0.4, the fatigue life meets its minimum. Then the fatigue life will increase with increasing friction coefficient. For [111] orientation, the change of fatigue life has no obvious trend, and while friction coefficient exceeds 0.6, the life almost constant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

74-80

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. lavella and D. Botto: Wear, Vol. 271(2011), p.1543.

Google Scholar

[2] N. K. Arakere, K. Erik and G. R. Swanson: J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, Vol. 128(2006), p.879.

Google Scholar

[3] D.S. Wei and Y.R. Wang: Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, Vol. 23(2010) p.5.

Google Scholar

[4] M.L. Peng, Z.C. Yang and Y.Y. Cao: Thermal Turbine, Vol. 38(2010), p.238.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Muthy, D. B. Garcia and J. F. Matlic: Acta Astronaut., Vol. 57(2005), p.1.

Google Scholar

[6] Z.P. Ding, Y.L. Liu Z.Y. Yin, et al.: Journal of Machine Design, Vol. 21(2004), p.38.

Google Scholar

[7] X. Huang, T.E. Gibson, M. Zhang, et al.: Tribol. Int., Vol. 42(2009), p.875.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Muthy, G. Gao and T. N. Farris: Tribol. Int., Vol. 39(2006), p.1227.

Google Scholar

[9] Q.Y. Xia: Research on fretting fatigue life of dovetail joint under low cycle load, (Nanjing University of aeronautics and astronautics, Nanjing 2005).

Google Scholar

[10] Y.X. Gu: Research on fretting fatigue life of dovetail joint under HCF-LCF load, (Nanjing University of aeronautics and astronautics, Nanjing 2007).

Google Scholar

[11] J.K. Duan X.Y. Yang L.W. Dong et al.: Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, Vol. 22(2009): p.28.

Google Scholar

[12] J.S. Wan, Z.F. Yue: Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 25(2004), p.39.

Google Scholar

[13] V. Levkovitch, R. Sievert, and B. Svendsen: International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 28(2006): p.1791.

Google Scholar