Confidence Based Hierarchical Online Ensemble Visual Tracking

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to adapt to the target appearance changes during visual tracking, feature model needs to be updated by online learning. However, online adaptive methods suffer from the drifting problem: error data are used for updating and will finally lead to tracking failure. In this paper, we propose a novel hierarchical online ensemble tracking method. Optical flow tracker is employed to predict the rough location. Online learning classifier is employed to detect the target. Template match is used to filter the data for updating. All these parts are combined together hierarchically by their confidence to ensure the stability of online learning and tracking. In contrast to the individual online learning and semi-supervised online learning, our method show more adaptability and stability. We demonstrate the performance on several public video sequences, which shows the improvement of our method over other online tracking approaches.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 945-949)

Pages:

1794-1800

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Grabner H, Bischof H, Online boosting and visions, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 2006, 1: 260-267.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.215

Google Scholar

[2] Grabner H, Leistner C, Bischof H, Semi-supervised online boosting for robust tracking, Computer Vision–ECCV, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 234-247.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_19

Google Scholar

[3] Babenko B, Yang M H, Belongie S. Visual tracking with online multiple instance learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2009: 983-990.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206737

Google Scholar

[4] Oza N C, Russell S, Online ensemble learning, AAAI/IAAI, 2000: 1109.

Google Scholar

[5] Adam A, Rivlin E, Shimshoni I, Robust fragments-based tracking using the integral histogram, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 2006, 1: 798-805.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.256

Google Scholar

[6] Avidan S, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions, 2007, 29(2): 261-271.

Google Scholar

[7] Hare S, Saffari A, Torr P H S, Struck: Structured output tracking with kernels, ICCV, IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 263-270.

DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126251

Google Scholar

[8] Kalal Z, Mikolajczyk K, Matas J, Tracking-learning-detection, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2012, 34(7): 1409-1422.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2011.239

Google Scholar

[9] Santner J, Leistner C, Saffari A, Prost: Parallel robust online simple tracking, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2010: 723-730.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540145

Google Scholar

[10] Kalal Z, Mikolajczyk K, Matas J, Forward-backward error: Automatic detection of tracking failures, ICPR, 2010 20th International Conference on. IEEE, 2010: 2756-2759.

DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2010.675

Google Scholar

[11] Bouguet J Y, Pyramidal implementation of the affine lucas kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm, Intel Corporation, 2001, 2: 3.

Google Scholar

[12] Wu Y, Lim J, Yang M H, Online object tracking: A benchmark, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2013: 2411-2418.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.312

Google Scholar