An Improved Rapid SURF Algorithm Based on Region of Interest

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to research application of speed-up robust feature (SURF) based on the region of interest for workpiece matching and positioning. Thresholding is a simple but important method to perform image segmentation. In order to reduces the complexity of the data and simplifies the process of recognition, the image is segmented by threshold value method which eliminates and suppresses useless information of image background. The image matching algorithm shows a better performance on real-time than the standard SURF and it succeeds in accelerating the speed of image pre-processing before image matching. In addition, the good robustness and adaptability of SURF are maintained. Compared with the traditional algorithm, improved algorithm enhances the efficiency of vision inspection system and can be used in other applications of image matching.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 945-949)

Pages:

1861-1868

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Efficient Image Matching with Distributions of Local Invariant Features.

Google Scholar

[2] David G. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Key points [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision. January 5, 2004, 60(2): 91-110.

DOI: 10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94

Google Scholar

[3] Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T. and Gool, L.V. (2006), SURF: speeded up robust features, European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 3951, pp.404-17.

DOI: 10.1007/11744023_32

Google Scholar

[4] Juan, L. and Gwun, O. (2009), A comparison of SIFT, PCA-SIFT and SURF, International Journal of Image Processing, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp.143-52.

Google Scholar

[5] Gonzalez and Woods, Digital image processing, 2nd Edition, prentice hall, (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] Tranos Zuva, Oludayo O. Olugbara, Sunday O. Ojo and Seleman M. Ngwira (2011), Image Segmentation, Available Techniques, Developments and Open Issues, Image Processing and Computer Vision, Vol. 2, No. 3, March (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] Zhou Huijian and Hu Qiong (2011), Fast Image Matching Based-on Improved SURF Algorithm, [C] Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC), 9-11 Sept, 1460-1463.

DOI: 10.1109/icecc.2011.6066546

Google Scholar

[8] Zhi-jie Dong, Feng Ye, Di Li and Jie-xian Huang (2012), PCB Matching Based on SURF, Circuit World, 38/3, 153-162.

DOI: 10.1108/03056121211250678

Google Scholar

[9] Ke, Y., Sukthankar, R., PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In: CVPR (2). (2004), 506-513.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206

Google Scholar

[10] Juan, L. and Gwun, O. (2009), A comparison of SIFT, PCA-SIFT and SURF, International Journal of Image Processing, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp.143-52.

Google Scholar