High-Tech Manufacturing Enterprises’ Competitive Strategies – The Case of Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing in Taiwan

Article Preview

Abstract:

In such competitive industry environment, if the companies will obtain continuous profits, they must surpass their competitors and enhance their enterprise competitiveness in order to win further customer orders. As to understand the market competitive conditions, Simultaneous Importance-Performance Analysis (SIPA) is able to provide simultaneous analysis of three fundamental concepts – the importance of the competitive character, the performance and the performance of the competitors. This study is based on the electronic materials manufacturing companies in Taiwan. Fourteen items from Order-winners and Qualifiers Criteria as the character assessment are taken for the case analysis of the company and its competitors’ competitive conditions and strategies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 945-949)

Pages:

3050-3055

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bei, L. T., & Shang, C. F. (2006). Building marketing strategies for state-owned enterprises against private ones based on the perspectives of consumer satisfaction and service quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 13, 1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.07.002

Google Scholar

[2] Burns, A. C. (1986). Generating marketing strategy priorities based on relative competitive position. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3(4), 49-56.

DOI: 10.1108/eb008179

Google Scholar

[3] Chen, C. F. & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29-35.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008

Google Scholar

[4] Hill, T. (2000). Manufacturing strategy: Text and cases. 3rd Edition, Basingstoke: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[5] Kim, J. S., & Arnold, P. (1993). Manufacturing competence and business performance: A framework and empirical analysis. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 13(10), 4-22.

DOI: 10.1108/01443579310045518

Google Scholar

[6] Lee, Y. C., & Hsieh, Y. F. (2011). Modifying IPA with DEMATEL composite importance. Paper presented at the meeting of 2011 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Neural Computing, Hong Kong, China.

Google Scholar

[7] Moses, A., Kwasi, A. G. and Jayanth , J. (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy : Techniques for analyzing industries and competitions. New York : The Free Press.

Google Scholar

[9] Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage : Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York : The Free Press.

Google Scholar

[10] Qing, C., Jeff, B. and James, J. H., (2012). The role of the competitive environment in studies of strategic alignment: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50(2), 567-580.

Google Scholar

[11] Wang, S. M., Feng, C. M., & Hsieh, C. H. (2010). Service quality in higher education : The role of student expectations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(11), 1103-1119.

DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2010.529329

Google Scholar

[12] Hill, T. (1993). Manufacturing strategy: The strategic management of the manufacturing function. 2nd Edition, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Google Scholar