Ultrasonic Tomographic Velocity Field Imaging Based on Interlaced Chord Network

Abstract:

Ultrasonic velocity tomography is a novel technique for velocity field measurement with the advantages of being non-invasive and insensitive to fluid properties. But its application is limited by poor spatial resolution. Thus, a novel ultrasonic velocity tomography method based on an interlaced chord network is proposed in this paper. To form the interlaced chord network, transducers are installed at two mounting planes of the pipe with N transducers on each plane, and 2×N transducers are equally spaced along the pipe circumference. In particular, N is selected to be an odd number to avoid blind zone. The average velocity on each chord is scanned in a fan-beam mode and used as projection data for velocity field reconstruction. The projection data are rearranged into a parallel beam mode and interpolated at a uniform interval. A filtered back projection algorithm is employed for 2-dimensional reconstruction of the velocity field. Numerical simulation experiments show that, the spatial resolution is improved obviously by the interlaced chord network without introducing extra transducers and 13 transducers on each mounting plane are enough for actual velocity field imaging downstream a single-bend pipe.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 950)
• Pages: 306-313
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.950.306
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Jian Nan Liu*, Bo Xiong Wang, Yuan Yuan Cui, Hao Yuan Wang
• Keywords: Filtered Back Projection, Interlaced Chord Network, Tomographic Reconstruction, Ultrasonic Tomography, Velocity Filed Imaging

References

[1] T. Sutham, K. Kinichi and S. Hiromichi. Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Vol. 28(1992), pp.1274-1281.

[2] S. Chun, B.R. Yoon and K.B. Lee. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 25(2011), pp.1475-1482.

[3] N.R. Michael, S.V. Ruchkin and S.A. Tereshchenko. 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Honolulu, HI, pp.803-806.

[4] E. Mandard, D. Kouame and R. Battault. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Vol. 55(2008), pp.161-172.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2008.625

[5] N. Majid, S. Kamran. Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 21(2010).

[6] M.A. Gondal, J. Mastromarino and U.K.A. Klein. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol 38(2002), pp.589-600.

[7] C.E. Willert, M. Gharib. Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 10(1991), pp.181-193.

[8] W. Johan, S. Iman and S. Mats. Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 62(2007), pp.4277-4293.

[9] P. Moore, G. Brown and P. Stimpson. Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 11(2000), pp.1802-1811.

[10] A.C. Kak, M. Slaney. Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. Piscataway: IEEE Press(1988).

[11] B.S. Kim, A.K. Khambampati and Y.J. Hong. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 31(2013), p.25–34.

[12] A. Kalpakli, R. Örlü. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 41(2013), pp.103-111.

[13] J. Zhang, B.X. Wang and Y.Y. Cui. Journal of Tsinghua University, Vol. 51(2011), pp.1089-1092.