Experiment Study on the Biogas Fermentation of the Cynodon dactlon (L.) Pers.

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to get the biogas fermentation potential of the Cynodon dactylon (L.)Pers, this experiment was conducted the CSRT anaerobic batch fermentation with the Cynodon dacytlon (L.)Pers. as the raw material and the mixed cultivate as inoculum, on the condition of feed concentration of 6.20%, temperature of 30°C and pH of 7.5. The fermentation period lasted 42 days. The results showed it produced total 4400mL biogas while went over the 80% of the biogas production in the early 25 days. The TS biogas production rate was 311mL/g, the VS biogas production rate was 372mL/g, and the raw material biogas production rate was 288mL/g, which implicated that Cynodon dactylon (L.)Pers. is a potential biogas fermentation raw material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 953-954)

Pages:

290-294

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Flora of China. Vol. 10(1).

Google Scholar

[2] Chunli Zhang. The Clinical Application of Herbal Cynodon dactylon(L. )Pers.

Google Scholar

[3] Yunde Teng. Cynodon dactylon(L. )Pers.

Google Scholar

[4] W.D. Zhang, H.C. Song, F. Yin, J.C. Li, in: Conventional Analysis of Biogas Fermentation, edited by Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, China(2003), in press.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Zhang, D.L. Wang, J. Sun, J.L. Hu. Pharmacogonstic Studies on National Medicine Plant Cynodon Dactylon (L. ) Pers. Vol. 31, No. 36, (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] P.J. Crutzen, M.O. Andreae. Biomass burning in the tropics: impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles [J]. Science, 1990, 250(4988): 1669-1678.

DOI: 10.1126/science.250.4988.1669

Google Scholar

[7] B. Langmann, B. Dumcan, C. Textor, et al. Vegetation fire emissions and their impact on air pollution and climate [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43: 107-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.047

Google Scholar