Remediation of Arsenic Contaminated Soils and Treatment of Washing Effluent Using Calcined Mn-Fe Layered Double Hydroxide

Article Preview

Abstract:

Arsenic contaminated soil is a serious worldwide problem nowadays, and soil washing technique is one of hottest topics in the area of remediating arsenic contaminated soils, while treatment of the washing effluent is still an urgent problem. In this study, in order to select the best washing extractants for arsenic contaminated soil of the Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, nine kinds of extractants (citric acid, oxalic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, H3PO4, KH2PO4, KOH, NH4Ac and ultra-pure water) were studied. Innovatively, a new material (calcined Mn-Fe Layered double hydroxide) was firstly introduced and fully applied to the adsorption of arsenic washing effluents. Results showed citric acid, oxalic acid and KH2PO4 were the optimal extractants for arsenic contaminated soil, considering the extraction rate and environmental perspective. When the concentrations were 200, 300, 300 mmol/ L , solution soil ratios were 10, 10, 20 mL/g , extraction times were 12,12,12 h, the citric acid, oxalic acid and KH2PO4, respectively, achieved the maximum extraction rate of 39%, 65% and 29%. Calcined Mn-Fe LDH used in this work was characterized by SEM and FT-IR, indicating the unique structure and high phase purity of the synthetic samples. For the 28mg/L arsenic effluent washing by citric acid, calcined Mn-Fe LDH showed the most effective capacity as adsorbent under neutral or weak base condition as well as 2 h absorption time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

2014-2021

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Peng K, Li X, Luo C, Shen Z. Vegetation composition and heavy metal uptake by wild plants at three contaminated sites in Xiangxi area, China. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2006; 41: 65-76.

DOI: 10.1080/10934520500298838

Google Scholar

[2] Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ. Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 2000; 41: 219-28.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00414-2

Google Scholar

[3] Wang C, Shen Z, Li X, Luo C, Chen Y, Yang H. Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils and stream sediments near a copper mine in Tongling, People's Republic of China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2004; 73: 862-9.

DOI: 10.1007/s00128-004-0506-x

Google Scholar

[4] Brewster MD, Passmore RJ. Use of Electrochemical Iron Generation for Removing Heavy-Metals from Contaminated Groundwater. Environmental Progress 1994; 13: 143-8.

DOI: 10.1002/ep.670130221

Google Scholar

[5] Tokunaga S, Hakuta T. Acid washing and stabilization of an artificial arsenic-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2002; 46: 31-8.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00094-7

Google Scholar

[6] Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth P, Sridokchan W, Goessler W. Arsenic species in an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pityrogramma calomelanos: a potential phytoremediator of arsenic-contaminated soils. Science of the Total Environment 2002; 284: 27-35.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00854-3

Google Scholar

[7] Dhankher OP, Li YJ, Rosen BP, Shi J, Salt D, Senecoff JF, et al. Engineering tolerance and hyperaccumulation of arsenic in plants by combining arsenate reductase and gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase expression. Nature Biotechnology 2002; 20: 1140-5.

DOI: 10.1038/nbt747

Google Scholar

[8] Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF. Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Engineering Geology 2001; 60: 193-207.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00101-0

Google Scholar

[9] Jang M, Hwang JS, Choi SI, Park JK. Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils and washing effluents. Chemosphere 2005; 60: 344-54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.018

Google Scholar

[10] Giacomino A, Malandrino M, Abollino O, Velayutham M, Chinnathangavel T, Mentasti E. An approach for arsenic in a contaminated soil: Speciation, fractionation, extraction and effluent decontamination. Environmental Pollution 2010; 158: 416-23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.010

Google Scholar

[11] Voglar D, Lestan D. Electrochemical separation and reuse of EDTA after extraction of Cu contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010; 180: 152-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.007

Google Scholar

[12] Tunay O, Kabdasli NI. Hydroxide Precipitation of Complexed Metals. Water Research 1994; 28: 2117-24.

Google Scholar

[13] Jiraroj D, Unob F, Hagege A. Degradation of Pb-EDTA complex by a H2O2/UV process. Water Research 2006; 40: 107-12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.041

Google Scholar

[14] Jung J, Yang JS, Kim SH, Yang JW. Feasibility of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) for the heavy metal removal in soil washing effluent. Desalination 2008; 222: 202-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.154

Google Scholar

[15] Reichle WT. Synthesis of Anionic Clay-Minerals (Mixed Metal-Hydroxides, Hydrotalcite). Solid State Ionics 1986; 22: 135-41.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90067-6

Google Scholar

[16] Wang SL, Liu CH, Wang MK, Chuang YH, Chiang PN. Arsenate adsorption by Mg/Al-NO3 layered double hydroxides with varying the Mg/Al ratio. Applied Clay Science 2009; 43: 79-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2008.07.005

Google Scholar

[17] Jiang JQ. Removing arsenic from groundwater for the developing world - a review. Water Science and Technology 2001; 44: 89-98.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2001.0348

Google Scholar

[18] Bissen M, Frimmel FH. Arsenic - a review. Part II: Oxidation of arsenic and its removal in water treatment. Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica 2003; 31: 97-107.

DOI: 10.1002/aheh.200300485

Google Scholar

[19] Grafe M, Eick MJ, Grossl PR, Saunders AM. Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on ferrihydrite in the presence and absence of dissolved organic carbon. Journal of Environmental Quality 2002; 31: 1115-23.

DOI: 10.2134/jeq2002.1115

Google Scholar

[20] Shi R, Jia YF, Wang CZ, Yao SH. Mechanism of arsenate mobilization from goethite by aliphatic carboxylic acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009; 163: 1129-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.068

Google Scholar

[21] Zeng M, Liao BH, Lei M, Zhang Y, Zeng QR, Ouyang B. Arsenic removal from contaminated soil using phosphoric acid and phosphate. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China 2008; 20: 75-9.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60011-x

Google Scholar

[22] Alam MGM, Tokunaga S, Maekawa T. Extraction of arsenic in a synthetic arsenic-contaminated soil using phosphate. Chemosphere 2001; 43: 1035-41.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00205-8

Google Scholar

[23] Titulaer MK, Jansen JBH, Geus JW. The Quantity of Reduced Nickel in Synthetic Takovite - Effects of Preparation Conditions and Calcination Temperature. Clays and Clay Minerals 1994; 42: 249-58.

DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1994.0420303

Google Scholar