Electrochemical Removal Cyanide in Wastewater by Ti/RuO2-Pt Electrodes

Article Preview

Abstract:

A laboratory-scale electrolytic cell with a Ti/RuO2-Pt anode and a Ti cathode was developed to treat high concentration cyanide-contained wastewater. The effects of the different electrode distances, concentration of chlorine anion and current densities, on the CN- removal were investigated. The results shown the too short and long electrode distance resulted in high energy consumption and low current, the appropriate electrode distance was essential. The CN- removal was very significant at the electrode distance was 9 cm, and the removal efficiency reached 99.2%. The removal CN- electrochemical oxidation was mainly attributed the success to in direct oxidation effect of chlorine /hypo-chlorite produced during the electrochemical reaction process. The CN- removal efficiency increased with increasing the concentration of chloride ion and operating current density. The optimum experimental condition was set at the electrode distance of 9 cm, NaCl dosage of 0.5 g/L, the current density of 10 mA/cm2, and pH of 12. At the optimum experimental condition, the CN- concentration in the solution decreased from 150.33 mg/L to 1.20 mg/L, and the CN- removal efficiency reached 99.2%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

2290-2293

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Sirianuntapiboon, K. Chairattanawan, M. Rarunroeng. Biological removal of cyanide compounds from electroplating wastewater (EPWW) by sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system. Jounal Hazard Mater. 154(2008): 526-534.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.056

Google Scholar

[2] P. Kampas, S. A. Parsons, P. Pearce, S. Ledoux, P. Vale. An internal carbon source for improving biological nutrient removal. Bioresource Technology. 100(2009), 149-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.023

Google Scholar

[3] S. M. Rao, B. V. V. Reddy. Characterization of Kolar gold field mine tailings for cyanide and acid drainage. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 24(2006), 1545-1559.

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-005-3372-3

Google Scholar

[4] M. Granato, Cyanide degradation by water hyacinths, Eichornia crassipes (Mart. ) Solms. Biotechnology Letters. 15(1993), 1085-1090.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00129943

Google Scholar

[5] R. R. Dash, A. G. C. Balomajumder. Cyanide in industrial wastewaters and its removal: A review on biotreatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 163(2009), 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.051

Google Scholar

[6] S. Li, B. Zheng, J. Zhu, B. Wang, The distribution and natural degradation of cyanide in goldmine waste-solid and polluted soil. Environmental Geology. 22(2001), 126-128.

Google Scholar

[7] Li S H, Zhang B S, Zhu J M. Natural cyanide degradation and impact on Ili River drainage areas from a Goldmine in Xinjiang autonomous region, China. Environ Geochem Health. 27(2005), 11-18.

DOI: 10.1007/s10653-004-1309-z

Google Scholar

[8] X. Lei, M. Li, Z. Zhang, C. Feng, W. Bai, N. Sugiura. Electrochemical regeneration of zeolites and the removal of ammonia. Jounal Hazard Mater. 69(2009), 746-752.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Osathaphan, T. Boonpitak, T. Laopirojana, V. K. Sharma. Removal of Cyanide and Zinc-Cyanide Complex by an Ion-Exchange Process. Water Air Soil Pollut. (2008) 179-183.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-008-9706-z

Google Scholar

[10] O. Gonzalez, M. Esplugas, C. Sans, et al. Performance of a Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor for the treatment of pre-oxidized Sulfamethoxazole solutions. Water Research. 43(2009), 2149-2158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.013

Google Scholar