Comparison of DNA Extraction and Purification Methods from Different Soils for Metagenomic Sequencing

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is an increased interest in the extraction of nucleic acids from various environmental samples, since only a minority of naturally occurring microbes can be cultured using standard techniques. Nucleic acids extraction and purification from soils are extremely challenging due to the low biomass, high organic contents and high variability of soil types. This has been regarded as one of the major difficulties that hamper the development of soil microbial ecology study. No commercial nucleic acids kits currently available are capable of preparing the DNAs without modifications. The cost can be very high for DNA extraction from extreme environmental soil samples, such as soils that have extreme high or low pHs. In this work, we developed and optimized soil DNA extraction and purification methods on different soils and compared the impact of three different DNA extraction protocols on DNA yield and purity. For the three different types of soil we used, direct extraction obtained the highest DNA recover rate, but required more cleanup steps. MoBio PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit yields less but do not require as many downstream cleaning steps. Both of the two methods obtained a more abundant microbial community than Meta-G-NomeTM DNA Isolation Kit.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

306-309

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.N. Miller: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 44 (2001), p.49.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Terrat, R. Christen, S. Dequiedt, M. Lelièvre, V. Nowak, T. Regnier, D. Bachar, P. Plassart, P. Wincker, C. Jolivet, A. Bispo, P. Lemanceau, P.A. Maron, C. Mougel and L. Ranjard: Microb. Biotechnol. Vol. 5 (2012), p.135.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00307.x

Google Scholar

[3] R.I. Amann, W. Ludwig and K.H. Schleifer: Microbiol. Rev. Vol. 59 (1995), p.143.

Google Scholar

[4] J.Y. Li, B. Li, Y. Zhou, J.F. Xu and J. Zhao: Lett. in Appl. Microbiol. Vol. 52 (2011), p.626.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Zhou, M.A. Bruns and J.M. Tiedje: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 62 (1996), p.316.

Google Scholar

[6] D.N. Miller, J.E. Bryant, E.L. Madsen and W.C. Ghiorse: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 65 (1999), p.4715.

Google Scholar

[7] C.R. Kuske, K.L. Banton, D.L. Adorada, P.C. Stark, K.K. Hill and P.J. Jackson: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 64 (1998), p.2463.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Malik, J. Kain, C. Pettigrew and A. Ogram: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 20 (1994), p.183.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Zhou, M.A. Bruns and J.M. Tiedje: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 (1996), p.316.

Google Scholar

[10] V. DeGrange and R. Bardin: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 61 (1995), p. (2093).

Google Scholar

[11] W.E. Holben, J.K. Jansson, B.K. Chelm and J.M. Tiedje: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54 (1988), p.703.

Google Scholar

[12] C.R. Kuske, K.L. Banton, D.L. Adorada, P.C. Stark, K.K. Hill and P.J. Jackson: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 64 (1998), p.2463.

Google Scholar

[13] R.J. Steffan, J. Goksoyr, A.K. Bej and R.M. Atlas: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 54 (1998), p.2908.

Google Scholar

[14] C.C. Young, R.L. Burghoff, L.G. Keim, V. Minak-Bernero, J.R. Lute and S.M. Hinton: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 59 (1993), p. (1972).

DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.6.1972-1974.1993

Google Scholar

[15] M. Krsek and E.M.H. Wellington: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 39 (1999), p.1.

Google Scholar