Value Theory of Lean Construction in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the common perspective of value for lean construction (LC) researchers and practitioners. Thus, this paper aims to generate a future discussion in the construction sector about the huge impact of construction projects over the entire society and, consequently, to underline the need of an expansion of current value perspectives moving from a local context (project level) to a global context (society). LC value perspectives lack in a common idea to be applied in the construction industry as a whole. Customer-focused construction practices, where satisfaction of customer requirements predominates over societal welfare. Practical implications – Construction industry should reformulate current practices and governments, as representative of the society, should promote construction regulation policies based on delivery of value including environmental and social issues.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

4138-4141

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2008), Governance and sustainability, Management DecisionJournal, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp.433-48.

Google Scholar

[2] Ballard, G. (2000), Lean project delivery system, White Paper No. 8, Lean ConstructionInstitute, Ketchum, ID, May 1, p.6.

Google Scholar

[3] Ballard, G. (2006), Rethinking project definition in terms of target costing, Proc. 14th AnnualConference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Santiago, Chile, pp.77-89.

Google Scholar

[4] Ballard, G. (2008), The lean project delivery system: an update, Lean Construction Journal, pp.1-19.

Google Scholar

[5] Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (1998), What kind of production is construction, Proc. 6th AnnualConference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Guaruja ´, Brazil, pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[6] Bertelsen, S. and Emmitt, S. (2005), The client as a complex system, Proc. 13th AnnualConference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Elsinore, Australia, pp.73-9.

Google Scholar

[7] Bertelsen, S. and Koskela, L. (2002), Managing the three aspects of production in construction, Proc. 10th Annual Conference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Gramado, Brazil, pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[8] Bertelsen, S. and Koskela, L. (2004), Construction beyond lean: a new understanding ofconstruction management, Proc. 12th Annual Conference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Elsinore, Denmark, pp.1-12.

DOI: 10.24928/2021/0124

Google Scholar

[9] Bjo ¨rnfot, A. and Sarde ´n, Y. (2006), Prefabrication: a lean strategy for value generation inconstruction, Proc. 14th Annual Conference on Lean Construction, IGLC, pp.265-77.

Google Scholar

[10] Bjo ¨rnfot, A. and Stehn, L. (2007), Value delivery through product offers: a lean leap inmulti-storey timber housing construction, Lean Construction Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp.33-45.

Google Scholar

[11] Cuperus, Y. and Napolitano, P. (2005), Open building/lean construction evaluation of a case inBrasil, Proc. 13th Annual Conference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Elsinore, Australia, pp.457-62.

Google Scholar

[12] Emmitt, S., Sander, D. and Christoffersen, A.K. (2004), Implementing value through lean design management, Proc. 12th Annual Conference on Lean Construction, IGLC, Elsinore, Denmark, pp.1-13.

Google Scholar