Serotype Identification and Drug Sensitive Test of the Pathogenic Escherichia coli

Article Preview

Abstract:

Thirty-eight isolates of Escherichia coli (E.coli) were isolated from chickens either ill or dead suspected with E.coli. These chickens come from chicken breeding farms in the districts of Baoding, Qinhuangdao and Beijing of China. The results of the antibiotics sensitivity test in the thirty-eight isolates to twenty-four kinds of antibiotics show that all isolates have presented antibiotic resistance disparately as well as multiresistance. All isolates are sensitive to Cephalosporins antibiotics and Aminoglycosides antibiotics such as Amikacin, Cefazolin, Cefradine, Cefoperazone and Ceftriaxone. Thirty-eight isolates are extremely resistant to Penicillins antibiotics, Lincomycins antibiotics, Tetracyclines antibiotics and Macrolides antibiotics such as Midecamycine, Lincomycin, Carbenicillin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin. Antibiotics sensitivity test provides a guidance for antibiotic application and scientific research on poultry farms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

207-213

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Cai Baoxiang: Lemology of domestic animals(fourth edition)(China agriculture press, China, 2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Zanella A., Alborali G. L. and Bardotti M.: Avian pauthology. Vol. 29 (2000), pp.311-317.

Google Scholar

[3] Ewers C., Janssen T. and Wieler L.H.: Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. Vol. 116 (2003), P. 381-395.

Google Scholar

[4] Lehn N., Stower-Hoffman J. and Kott T.: J Clin Microbiol. Vol. 34 (1996), P. 597-605.

Google Scholar

[5] The Chinese academy of agricultural science Harbin veterinary research institute. veterinary microbiology (China agriculture press, China 1998).

Google Scholar

[6] O Brien T.F., Ross D.G. and Guzman M.A.: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Vol. 17 (1980) pp.537-543.

Google Scholar

[7] Miles T.D., McLaughlin W. and Brown P.D.: BMC Veterinary Research. Vol. 2 (2006), p.7.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang Zhuonan: Chinese Journal of Animal Quaranting. Vol. 22 (2005), pp.38-39.

Google Scholar

[9] Bass, L., Liebert C.A. and Lee M.D.: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Vol. 43 (1999), pp.2-929.

Google Scholar

[7] Saenz, Y., Zarazaga M. and Brinas L.: Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. Vol. 18 (2001), pp.353-358.

Google Scholar

[8] Schroeder, C. M., Zhao C. and DebRoy C.: Appl Environ Microbiol. Vol. 68 (2002) pp.576-558.

Google Scholar

[9] Bass, L., C. A. Liebert and M. D. Lee: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Vol. 43 (1999), pp.2-929.

Google Scholar

[10] Saenz, Y., Zarazaga M. and Brinas L.: Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. Vol. 18 (2001), pp.353-358.

Google Scholar

[11] Schroeder, C. M., C. Zhao and C. DebRoy: Appl Environ Microbiol. Vol. 68 (2002), pp.576-558.

Google Scholar

[12] Song Li, Ning Yibao and Zhang Xiuying: Scientia Agricultura Sinica. Vol. 38 (2005), pp.1466-1473.

Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Xiuying, Wu Haoting and Zhao Hui: Chin. J. Vete. sci. Vol. 4 (2005), pp.422-424.

Google Scholar

[14] Lei Liancheng, Zheng Dao and Han Wenyu: Chin. J. Vet. Sci. Vol. 25 (2005), pp.470-473.

Google Scholar

[15] Ji Chunxiao, Hu Gongzheng and Cheng Yintian: Shanghai Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine. Vol. 2 (2005), pp.27-29.

Google Scholar