Compare the Petrophysics of Formation Type I and II by Mercury Injection Curve Normalization

Ling Yun Chen; Yi Kun Liu; Li Hua Xia; Qian Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.960-961.258

Paper Titles

Research on the Mobility of Polymer Flooding System for Xinjiang Conglomerate Reservoirs
p.240

Study on Plastic Strain and Plastic Strain Rate in Machining of Steel AISI 1020 Using FEM Analysis
p.245

Rheological Properties of Sodium Metatungstate in Aqueous Solutions
p.249

Pore Network Simulation of Two Phase Flow Based on X-Ray Micro Computed Tomography Images
p.254

Compare the Petrophysics of Formation Type I and II by Mercury Injection Curve Normalization
p.258

Effect of Compatilizers on Morphology and Properties of Natural Rubber/Polyvinyl Alcohol (NR/PVA) Blends
p.262

Preparation of the Scales Material Adsorption EGCG
p.270

Classification and Morphological Structure of Scale in the Process of Alumina Production High Pressure Digestion
p.274

Economic Analysis of Buried Corrugated Steel Culverts Considering Deterioration
p.281

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 960-961Compare the Petrophysics of Formation Type I and...

Compare the Petrophysics of Formation Type I and II by Mercury Injection Curve Normalization

Abstract:

Study on Formation Type II is so few that affect on tapping the potential ^[2]. Analyzing petrophysics of Formation Type I and II by mercury injection curve normalization, it’s vital to developing method choice on tapping the potential of Formation Type II. Capillary pressure curves (Pc-curves) from conventional Mercury Injection are hard to analyze and compare because of various shapes. To get typical capillary pressure curves for Formation Type I and II, the curves from Mercury Injection is processed by Function J, and the J function curves and normalized Pc-curves for tabulated thin layers, tabulated thick layers and un-tabulated layers in Formation Type I and II, compare and analyze the influence of permeability on the shape of J function curves and normalized Pc-curves; compare the influence of different kinds of layers with the same permeability order of magnitude on the shape of J function curves and normalized Pc-curves, i.e. the influence of other factors except permeability, to get some visual identification methods and analyze the petrophysics difference between Formation Type I and II which is shown on Pc-curves.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Thermal, Power and Electrical Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 960-961)

Pages:

258-261

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.960-961.258

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Ling Yun Chen*, Yi Kun Liu, Li Hua Xia, Qian Liu

Keywords:

Mercury Injection, Normalization, Petrophysics

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Chen Jie: Research Method Summary on character of pore structure in formation rock [J], Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 12 (4): 11-14, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Gu Tuan: Further Understanding on Formation II in matured block [J], China Petroleum Exploration.

Google Scholar

[3] Liao Jing: Normalization of Pc-curves and J function Processing [J], Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 15(6), (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Xiaopeng: Pc-curves for formation drawing and application [J], Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 30(6), (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] Li Yanshan: Classification and Research on Formation Chang 6 at Changqing Area by Mercury Injection Data [J], lithologic reservoirs, 21(2): 91-93, (2009).

Google Scholar