Determination of Chemical Composition, Nutritional Ingredients and Bioactive Compounds of Three Cultivars of Mango Seeds

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three principal mango cultivars (Yuexi No.1, Tainong No.1 and Guifei) grown in Guangdong province in China were selected, and their chemical composition, nutritional ingredients including fatty acid and amino acid, and bioactive compounds such as phenolics and flavonoids were characterized and compared. The results showed the mango seeds had high moisture content (64.74-71.84%) and crude fibre content (50.86-60.62%), and the seeds of Yuexi No.1 had the lowest content of protein (1.21%), total lipid (1.47%), total sugar (2.79%), and highest content of Ca (537.02 mg/100 g), Na (22.60 mg/100 g), Zn (6.13 mg/100 g), Fe (17.02 mg/100 g) compared with the other two cultivars. The total amino acid (AA) in Guifei seeds (4.33%) was the highest, but the proportion of essential AA was the lowest. Seven fatty acid compounds were found in the three varieties. Moreover, Tainong No.1 had highest content of total phenolics (10.82%) followed with Guifei (1.86%) and Yuexi No.1 (1.06%), while the flavonoid content of Tainong No.1 was 2.71%, higher than Yuexi No.1 (0.37%) and Guifei (0.70%).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

1211-1216

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Maisuthisakul M.H. Gordon: Food Chemistry Vol. 117 (2009), p.332.

Google Scholar

[2] A.E. Abdalla S.M. Darwish E.H. Ayad and R.M. El-Hamahmy: Food chemistry Vol. 103 (2007), p.1134.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Cunniff: Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, (1995).

DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.44636

Google Scholar

[4] X. Rui,L. Caiqin,L. Wangjin,D. Juan,W. Zehuai and L. Jianguo: Gene Vol. 498 (2012), p.28.

Google Scholar

[5] J.G. Salinas,R. García: Métodos químicos para el análisis de suelos ácidos y plantas forrajeras, Free download form CIAT, (1985).

Google Scholar

[6] M.M. Al-Dabbas,R. Ahmad R.Y. Ajo,K. Abulaila,M. Akash and K. Al-Ismail: Crop Research (Hisar) Vol. 40 (2010), p.161.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ecker,M. Scherer,G. Schmitz and G. Liebisch: Journal of Chromatography B Vol. 897 (2012), p.98.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Singleton J.A. Rossi: American journal of Enology and Viticulture Vol. 16 (1965), p.144.

Google Scholar

[9] T.M. Jia zhishen, Wu Jianming: Food Chemistry Vol. 64 (1999), p.555.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Dhingra A.C. Kapoor: Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture Vol. 36 (1985), p.752.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Elegbede,I. Achoba and H. Richard: Journal of food biochemistry Vol. 19 (1995), p.391.

Google Scholar

[12] X.B. Huang L.J. Lin J.H. Li,X. Ran and Y.F. Tang: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 610 (2013), p.3387.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Rafat,K. Philip and S. Muniandy: Research Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 5 (2010), p.1.

Google Scholar

[14] R.M. Robles-Sánchez M.A. Rojas-Graü,I. Odriozola-Serrano,G. González-Aguilar and O. Martin-Belloso: LWT - Food Science and Technology Vol. 50 (2013), p.240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.021

Google Scholar

[15] G. Yuntao,F. Yanli,L. Zhengquan and J. Jinchao11: Food and Fermentation Industries Vol. 9 (2009), p.053.

Google Scholar