Analysis of Comprehensive Benefits of Environmental Protection Investments Based on Projection Pursuit Model

Jun Gao; Yuan Tang Lu; Peng Chen; Shun Qing Xu; Jian Hua Zhu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2116

Paper Titles

Demand and Development Measures for Liaoning Environmental Protection Industry
p.2096

Analysis on Environmental Protection from the Perspective of Environmental Democracy
p.2101

Influence Factors on the Differentiation of Enterprise Environmental Strategy
p.2105

Spatio-Temporal Distributions and Environmental Safety Threshold of Cropland Fertilization of Jiangsu Province, China
p.2110

Analysis of Comprehensive Benefits of Environmental Protection Investments Based on Projection Pursuit Model
p.2116

Analysis on Gray Correlation between Environmental Pollution Level and Influence Factors in Jilin Province
p.2120

Characteristics of Environmental Impact and Cumulative Effects Analysis
p.2125

Empirical Study on the Relationship between Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution Level in Jilin Province
p.2129

Research on the Environmental Performance Audit Evaluation Index System Construction of Country Government in China
p.2133

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 962-965Analysis of Comprehensive Benefits of...

Analysis of Comprehensive Benefits of Environmental Protection Investments Based on Projection Pursuit Model

Abstract:

Based on the theory of Projection Pursuit Model, a comprehensive benefits assessment model for environmental protection investments was built. According to values of the projection vector components, contributions of evaluation index to the comprehensive benefits were analyzed. On the basis of the model, overall benefits of provincial environmental protection investments were assessed. Results showed that, comprehensive benefits of environmental protection investments in annual 2010 had a strong regional property, descending from the east coast to the northwest inland, environmental protection benefits in provinces such as Shandong、Zhejiang and Jiangsu were higher, while in northwest inland, it was relatively low.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Resources and Sustainable Development III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

2116-2119

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2116

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Jun Gao, Yuan Tang Lu*, Peng Chen, Shun Qing Xu, Jian Hua Zhu

Keywords:

Comprehensive Benefit, Environmental Protection Investment, Projection PursuitModel

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Liu Gaini, Wang Huixiao, Lu Yuantang. Review on Forecasting Methods of Foreign Environmental Protection Investment[J]. Environmental Science and Management. 2012, 37(01): 115-119.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Constantinides. Methodology for the use of cost-benefit analysis in environmental investment projects- a review of the island of Rhodes analysis[R]. UNEP(OCA)/MED WG. 45/5, (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] Vaughan, W. J. and S. Ardila. Economic analysis of the Environmental Aspects of Investment Projects[R]. Inter-American Development Bank, (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] Miu Lei, Qi huan. Preparation of the environmental protection industry input -output tables[J]. Market Modernization. 2007, 523: 349-350.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang Hongqiang, Cao Dong, Yu Fang. The accounting model of environmental protection improving economic development and its application[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(01): 216-221.

Google Scholar