An Efficient and Robust Kernelized Possibilistic C-Means Clustering Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

To avoid the initialization sensitivity and low computational efficiency problems of the kernelized possibilistic c-means clustering algorithm (KPCM), a new clustering algorithm called efficient and robust kernelized possibilistic c-means clustering algorithm (ERKPCM) was proposed in this paper. ERKPCM improved KPCM by two ways. First, the data are refined by the data reduction technique, which makes it keep the data structure of the original data and have higher efficiency. Secondly, weighted clustering algorithm is executed several times to estimate cluster centers accurately, which makes it more robust to initializations and get more reasonable partitions. As a by-product, ERKPCM overcomes the problem of generating coincident clusters of KPCM. The contrast experimental results with conventional algorithms show that ERKPCM is more robust to initializations, and has a relatively high precision and efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

2881-2885

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bezdek, J. C. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers. (1981).

Google Scholar

[2] Krishnapuram, R., & Keller, J. M. The possibilistic c-means algorithm: insights and recommendations. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 4(3), 385-393. (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/91.531779

Google Scholar

[3] Krishnapuram, R., & Keller, J. M. A possibilistic approach to clustering. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 1(2), 98-110. (1993).

DOI: 10.1109/91.227387

Google Scholar

[4] Barni, M., Cappellini, V., & Mecocci, A. Comments on. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 4(3), 393-396. (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/91.531780

Google Scholar

[5] Timm, H., Borgelt, C., Döring, C., & Kruse, R. An extension to possibilistic fuzzy cluster analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 147(1), 3-16. (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2003.11.009

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang, J. S., & Leung, Y. W. Improved possibilistic c-means clustering algorithms. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 12(2), 209-217. (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2004.825079

Google Scholar

[7] Pal, N. R., Pal, K., Keller, J. M., & Bezdek, J. C. A possibilistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4), 517-530. (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2004.840099

Google Scholar

[8] Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K. R. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural computation, 10(5), 1299-1319. (1998).

DOI: 10.1162/089976698300017467

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang, D. Q., & Chen, S. C. Kernel-based fuzzy and possibilistic c-means clustering. In Proceedings of the International Conference Artificial Neural Network , 122-125. (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] Filippone, M., Camastra, F., Masulli, F., & Rovetta, S. A survey of kernel and spectral methods for clustering. Pattern recognition, 41(1), 176-190. (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.05.018

Google Scholar